<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: swindmill</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=swindmill</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:57:01 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=swindmill" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by swindmill in "Launch HN: RunAnywhere (YC W26) – Faster AI Inference on Apple Silicon"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Have you tried <a href="https://handy.computer" rel="nofollow">https://handy.computer</a> ?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 17:54:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47326600</link><dc:creator>swindmill</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47326600</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47326600</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by swindmill in "AMD Ryzen 7 2700X User Publishes Benchmarks and Overclocking Results"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>FWIW I am running a two week old Ryzen 5 2400G and ASRock Fatal1ty X370 Gaming-ITX/ac setup with rock solid stability under Windows 10. I did end up having to run my 3200MHz memory at 2933Mhz to avoid some issues. This is the max memory speed the CPU supports anyways so I don't consider it a large loss. The ASRock published memory QVL agrees with my finding that 3200MHz isn't stable with the specific memory I'm using. See <a href="https://www.asrock.com/MB/AMD/Fatal1ty%20X370%20Gaming-ITXac/index.asp#MemoryRR" rel="nofollow">https://www.asrock.com/MB/AMD/Fatal1ty%20X370%20Gaming-ITXac...</a><p>What ASRock model are you using? Are you sure the culprit is the CPU or motherboard and not another component?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 05:39:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16752267</link><dc:creator>swindmill</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16752267</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16752267</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by swindmill in "AWS mistakes to avoid"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://github.com/cloudtools/troposphere" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/cloudtools/troposphere</a> is a good option here<p>Also <a href="https://github.com/russellballestrini/botoform" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/russellballestrini/botoform</a> looks to be a newer solution in this space<p>Terraform is another option and then there's the model we're actively moving towards at work: using Ansible to abstract and completely replace calls to CloudFormation with a combination of existing and bespoke modules to dynamically spin up the infrastructure we need.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:52:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10795267</link><dc:creator>swindmill</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10795267</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10795267</guid></item></channel></rss>