> Someone was writing all that trash by hand.

And reading code written by AI isn't the same as reading code written by a real expert person.

There still exists the difference of quality of the written code and people who use AIs are lazy enough to accept code with vulnerabilities - see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45034496

Bun is also iterating back and forth with AI. The rewrite only got popular because of bigger scope. The bigger the scope is, the more bugs there are.

> getting node compatibility tests passing

So does Bun.

> which is something an LLM is very good at.

Doesn't matter. The code those LLMs operate on is simple enough that any middle software engineer can do.

Sure, but it's not an excuse for making the world a shittier place by publishing more AI content. It's very known that AIs have agreement bias and mostly agree with you.

44% of new music uploaded to Deezer is AI generated.

Source: https://newsroom-deezer.com/2026/04/ai-generated-tracks-repr...

Also she said 4 years ago that "literature is not for idiots". I don't think calling people names is a good way of promoting your content. And now she's complaining that the amount of people reading her works is declining?

Furthermore, she accused academic teachers of narrow thinking (apparently calling people 'idiots' wasn't enough). Honestly, Andrzej Dragan works [1] are arguably more important, but who am I to judge?

[1] https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeqEKD_20RZoMRPCZ39ZPd8oP...

Maybe she instead of glazing herself should get a reality check.

Also see this comment:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48196708

> She uses the AI for a job that should be hers, not the AI's.

Also what would she otherwise buy the AI for? Cooking recipes? I'm on the free plan and hardly hit any limits.

She didn't ask it "what profession could person X be in an Y novel". She asked it to develop (rozwinąć) a story.

It's not that hard to understand that developing a story is actually her job.

Small details (profession, name, colours) are ok (my opinion). Developing parts of the story is not.

You may wonder where the line is - many reputable Polish writers are in consensus - no AI.

AI should have no place in creative works.

You are free to think otherwise. However I don't think those writers are wrong, especially if they're talking on a subject that is their profession, I'm no writer.

She actually did. See my other comment:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48210766

She also said:

> jak fantastycznie powiększa on horyzonty i pogłębia myślenie kreatywne

> how incredibly it widens horizons and deepens creative thinking

AI doesn't have the ability to improve one's creative thinking. In order to improve, you have to practice - there's nothing more to it and it applies to all professions.

Also, I wonder how did she come to the conclusion that it does so.

She uses the AI for a job that should be hers, not the AI's.

Furthermore, she publicly stated she bought the highest plan without specifying the model.

> None have managed to at the level we are talking about.

You seem to be implying somebody accused her of relying purely on AI, which no one actually did.

Many good Polish writers (as stated in the Lubimy Czytać article) said that for them it's unimaginable to use AI for writing, in any form.

The companies are making the AI creative (whatever the definition), not her. Don't give her credit for something she had no impact on.

She's using AI for world building and working on top of it. Ask a few people whose job is world building (e.g. games) and no one will tell you that using AI is to be proud of.

I wouldn't call outsourcing your creativity "impressive".

It's not clickbait.

> Często wprost rzucam maszynie pomysł do analizy z prośbą: kochana, jak mogłybyśmy to pięknie rozwinąć?

> I often directly throw an idea at it for an analysis asking: darling, how could we expand this beautifully?

Source: https://lubimyczytac.pl/aktualnosci/23065/olga-tokarczuk-o-a...

It's exactly like using AI for song creation where you direct it where it's going. It's no different than asking AI to generate an image and you redrawing it so it doesn't have AI traces.

b) This being a fundamental question proves scientific curiosity. We wouldn't have achieved current technology if not for scientific curiosity.

I don't think quantum computing currently is able to help in the AI industry, I don't think this is having any impact.

WIG20 is essentially 5 banks, 3 energy providers, clothing, small shops + Allegro + CD Projekt Red. I don't think any of this has major world impact.

I'm eagerly waiting for the prices to come down so I can upgrade my PC to AM5 and run Gemma 4.