<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: szx0</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=szx0</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 20:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=szx0" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by szx0 in "A Tale of Two Programmers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What if your 1950 was less expressive and more cryptic to understand, and the 8800 was very verbose and easy for a newbie to pick up?<p>So you can't measure less LOC means it's better, it really depends on the quality of the code from a maintainability standpoint not just the size of code.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:40:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=679015</link><dc:creator>szx0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=679015</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=679015</guid></item></channel></rss>