Could they send one (or two) my way?

I doubt it.

* publish the logs.

A euphemism in polite company for: we'll ban them on national security grounds like we did with cars and phones.

(Husband and father of daughters).

Incorrect, this is EXACTLY the scenario that the Cloud Act was introduced to to handle.

What happened is in 2013 Microsoft Ireland refused an FBI warrant for information held on EU servers, under the control of MS Ireland.

Microsoft USA refused the warrant on the grounds on the jurisdiction grounds you mentioned above.

So the Cloud Act was passed: US law for access to digital information applies to any subsidiary anywhere on earth.

Sorry.

1. the 2018 CLOUD Act mandates US companies — and their subsidiaries — to provide information to the US government on demand, regardless of where the data is stored

2. FISA secret courts prevent companies from even saying they where summoned, or telling anyone who or what the case was about (including canaries).

So you won't ever know if your data was handed over to the US government.

Partially correct. The purpose of your software to its owners is also to provide future value to customers competitively.

What we have learnt is that software needs to be engineered: designed and structured.

So, most of the planet (1)

(1) Well, excluding Ethiopia because they still thought it was cool to have slaves.

The UK and France have long had a project 'on the shelf' to substitute the missiles with the French M51 ballistic missiles.

They don't want to do it, they'll do it if they have to.

The dependency is latent, is only become a problem when you (USA) does something to dick with China's dependency on you.

If you don't do that, no problems. The rest of us live just fine depending on things from China.

But the sun would rise the next day and the USA won't like the 'non-kinetic' consequences. Too many to enumerate.

Eventually the adults in USA would just return it.

Firing on one British officer would be as bad a firing on 10000.

It's about lines.

Rich powerful countries could also keep slaves and no one would be able to stop it by force.

But they don't. Civilisation advances.

That was a signal, thankfully there are still adults in the USA who recognised it.

https://ucmj.us/is-attacking-civilians-a-war-crime/

@dang: you've banned members from this forum before for messy threads merely discussing apartheid. Surely advocating for war crimes — that the US itself considers crimes — is beyond the pale?

Stick to the challenge: what won't you accept? Nothing?