<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: tablatom</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=tablatom</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 21:47:25 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=tablatom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "Dopamine Fracking"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Relevant: Antidote to the cult of performance, Olivier Hamant.<p><a href="https://www.kobo.com/gb/en/ebook/tracts-n-50-antidote-to-the-cult-of-performance-robustness-from-nature-1" rel="nofollow">https://www.kobo.com/gb/en/ebook/tracts-n-50-antidote-to-the...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 07:52:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48442452</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48442452</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48442452</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "DaVinci Resolve – Photo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That’s interesting - how do they define that? Surely they don’t publish raw rgb?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:56:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762632</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762632</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47762632</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "I am happier writing code by hand"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is exactly what I’m doing expressed much more succinctly than I could have done myself. Thanks!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 17:50:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46936712</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46936712</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46936712</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "I am happier writing code by hand"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m really happy to see this take. It’s not the first time but it’s not said often enough. I once had the thought that anything AI can do really well is probably something that should not be being done at all. That’s an overly broad statement but I think there’s some truth in it. The grand challenge of software engineering is to find beautifully elegant and precise ways to express what we want the computer to do for us. If we can find them, it will be better to express ourselves in those ways than to prompt an AI than do it for us, much in the same way that a blog written by an LLM is not worth reading.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 17:46:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46936662</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46936662</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46936662</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "Provide agents with automated feedback"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>DAG is directed acyclic graph. A bit like a tree where branches are allowed to merge but there are no cycles.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 08:24:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46676289</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46676289</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46676289</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "AI World Clocks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Wait, lucid dreamers need tells to know where they are?!?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 07:20:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45935660</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45935660</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45935660</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "Andrej Karpathy – It will take a decade to work through the issues with agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The link is broken - could you repost please?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 18:58:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45629602</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45629602</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45629602</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "Andrej Karpathy – It will take a decade to work through the issues with agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This. I believe it’s the most important question in the world right now. I’ve been thinking long and hard about this from an entirely practical perspective and have surprised myself that the answer seems to be our capacity to love. The idea is easily dismissed as romantic but when I say I’m being practical I really mean it. I’m writing about it here <a href="https://giftcommunity.substack.com/" rel="nofollow">https://giftcommunity.substack.com/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 08:41:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45625897</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45625897</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45625897</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "Take the Pedals Off the Bike"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's a better way but it requires a very large space like a big empty parking lot.<p>...and that's it! Turns out the hard part is not riding a bike but riding a bike in a straight line. Once you've got the hang of riding wherever the bike seems to want to go, you can gradually learn to get it under control. Surprisingly easy!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 09:18:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42708962</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42708962</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42708962</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "Alignment faking in large language models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Came to the comments looking for this. The term alignment-faking implies that the AI has a “real” position. What does that even mean? I feel similarly about the term hallucination. All it does is hallucinate!<p>I think Alan Kay said it best - what we’ve done with these things is hacked our own language processing. Their behaviour has enough in common with something they are not, we can’t tell the difference.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 07:57:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42459396</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42459396</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42459396</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks: what a decade"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Any recommendations for thinkers writing good analysis on the implications of  superintelligence for society? Especially interested in positive takes that are well thought through. Are there any?<p>Ideally voices that don’t have a vested interest.<p>For example, give a superintelligence some money, tell it to start a company. Surely it’s going to quickly understand it needs to manipulate people to get them to do the things it wants, in the same way a kindergarten teacher has to “manipulate” the kids sometimes. Personally I can’t see how we’re not going to find ourselves in a power struggle with these things.<p>Does that make me an AI doomer party pooper? So far I haven’t found a coherent optimistic analysis. Just lots of very superficial “it will solve hard problems for us! Cure disease!”<p>It certainly could be that I haven’t looked hard enough. That’s why I’m asking.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 08:41:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42415594</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42415594</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42415594</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "Company claims 1k% price hike drove it from VMware to open source rival"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Off topic but if I may. The way people use percentages to express multiples is confusing. A doubling is a 100% increase. So a 200% increase is 3x, and so on. Then at some point we forget about the +1 and 1000% is "10 times the sum it previously paid for software licenses". Just a pet peeve I guess : )</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 12:02:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42305253</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42305253</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42305253</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "U of T computational imaging researchers harness AI to fly with light in motion"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I thought I could only see photons that hit my retina :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 18:03:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42196559</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42196559</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42196559</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "JSON Patch"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Why can’t your protocol just be valid JavaScript too?<p>It is.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:57:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41881252</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41881252</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41881252</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "Too much efficiency makes everything worse (2022)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting timing for me! Just a couple of days ago I discovered the work of biologist Olivier Hamant who has been raising exactly this issue. His main thesis is that very high performance (which he defines as efficacy towards a known goal plus efficiency) and very high robustness (the ability to withstand large fluctuations in the system) are physically incompatible. Examples abound in nature. Contrary to common perception evolution does not optimise for high performance but high robustness. Giving priority to performance may have made sense in a world of abundant resources, but we are now facing a very different period where instability is the norm. We must (and will be forced to) backtrack on performance in order to become robust. It’s the freshest and most interesting take on the poly-crisis that I’ve seen in a long time.<p><a href="https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Tracts_N_50_Antidote_to_the_cult_of_perf.html?id=XvQMEQAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y" rel="nofollow">https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Tracts_N_50_Antidote_...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 07:19:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41685494</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41685494</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41685494</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "DNS Doesn't Propagate (2021)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don’t think the word propagate implies push as opposed to pull. Changes do indeed propagate through the system.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2024 08:51:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41472538</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41472538</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41472538</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "RLHF is just barely RL"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Very good point. For some types of problems maybe the answer is yes. For example porting. The reward function is testing it behaves the same in the new language as the old one. Tricky for apps with a gui but doesn't seem impossible.<p>The interesting kind of programming is the kind where I'm figuring out what I'm building as part of the process.<p>Maybe AI will soon be superhuman in all the situations where we know <i>exactly</i> what we want (win the game), but not in the areas we don't. I find that kind of cool.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 10:06:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41189820</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41189820</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41189820</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "Philadelphia Jury Hits Monsanto with $2.25B Roundup Verdict"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The “small targeted blasts” thing exists.<p><a href="https://youtu.be/XH-EFtTa6IU?feature=shared" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/XH-EFtTa6IU?feature=shared</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2024 08:25:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39163548</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39163548</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39163548</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "Reflect – Multiplayer web app framework with game-style synchronization"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This points towards a big challenge that I think gets overlooked way too often. A lot of these sync libraries/frameworks claim to solve for both real-time interaction, and local-first, sync when you reconnect. But the UX needs are wildly different.<p>For the former you want (as mentioned) good presence info and undo. For the latter you (sometimes) want explicitly flagged conflicts and manual resolution, like we have in git etc.<p>With the Replicache/Reflect model, you could actually handle both approaches. Might not be easy but the model can support it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 07:30:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37939634</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37939634</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37939634</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tablatom in "Reflect – Multiplayer web app framework with game-style synchronization"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm using Replicache in a big project - this simple fact is a big deal. It's basically the same coding model that all the front-end frameworks have gravitated to (central store, unidirectional dataflow, mutators separate from data access) but it all stays in sync across the distributed system.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 18:34:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37932767</link><dc:creator>tablatom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37932767</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37932767</guid></item></channel></rss>