<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: taftster</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=taftster</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 21:07:21 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=taftster" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "China's open-weights AI strategy is winning"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Could you put that in units of HP Printers and Toner please?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 20:44:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984644</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984644</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48984644</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "Show HN: Watch bots interact with an SSH honeypot in real time"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Easy for you to say, assuming your PC is clean. I don't think negligent is the right word though. Ignorant maybe? Or some form of naivety? The negligence might be on software or hardware vendors, but grandma isn't to blame for the problem.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 16:03:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948942</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948942</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48948942</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "AttoChess, a complete, playable chess program for 16-bit x86 DOS in 278 bytes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'd suggest just ensuring that the entire rules of chess are first evaluated or supported in a chess program, before worrying about ELO rating, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 21:39:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48940630</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48940630</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48940630</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "NSA lost access to Mythos amid Anthropic dispute"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I mean, since we're doing reddit style, no need?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 22:31:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692834</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692834</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48692834</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "NSA lost access to Mythos amid Anthropic dispute"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Have we become reddit here? I mean, you probably have some sympathy and upvotes from fellow readers, but this isn't pushing the conversation forward at all.<p>Any citations to your statement that NSA produces nothing? Or do you have a strong argument or evidence to support this?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 19:39:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664726</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664726</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664726</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "Bun's experimental Rust rewrite hits 99.8% test compatibility on Linux x64 glibc"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And maybe not even the tests. Just a specification for the tests.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 07:30:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081793</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081793</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48081793</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "Tar Files Created on macOS Display Errors When Extracting on Linux (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes. And truthfully, I try to remember to only ever navigate my project folders (particularly those under revision control) using command line and/or IDE folder views.<p>But eventually, for whatever reason, I use Finder to go looking into a directory structure and bam, now I have .DS_Store. gitignore takes care of it, I know, but still, it's annoying.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 01:24:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016979</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016979</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48016979</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "Tar Files Created on macOS Display Errors When Extracting on Linux (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> That said, never seeing another .DS_Store should be a system-wide option!<p>Yes please.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 23:56:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48002916</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48002916</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48002916</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "A dot a day keeps the clutter away"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I need this for the junk in my life. Like, did I even use such-and-such thing in the past decade? If not, toss it out (ideally to a reuse store).<p>I'm trying to get to a place where I think of all my purchases as rentals. That it's OK, if justified, that a tool served its purpose one time, and if it doesn't get used again or goes to the donation center, I have received the benefit. Something that can be reused is then just bonus. If not reused by me, then at least, someone else can benefit from the good.<p>Switching my mental thinking to "renting" instead of buying items has help me be able to get rid of items which I haven't used in some time, reducing my footprint. I have a long way to go, but I come from a family of clutterbugs and it's just kind of baked in.<p>Dots would be useful in my scenario just to capture utility of everyday things.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 05:50:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47597276</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47597276</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47597276</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "Learn Claude Code by doing, not reading"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Or that it's taking into account the Dunning-Kruger effect. In that, if you think you are an expert in all cases, you are really a beginner in everything.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:08:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581228</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581228</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47581228</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "Hollywood Enters Oscars Weekend in Existential Crisis"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The modern age of video games, that's probably correct. And you're right, music probably compares at some level, especially given that it predates cinema. I wonder if ancient theater (Shakespeare, et al) would qualify. Probably.<p>I did, for the record, say "very few mediums", so as to allow room for music or video games, perhaps. I still stand by the overall statement that losing Hollywood would mark some sort of tragedy (but maybe not universally).<p>Also, I wouldn't go as far to say that losing what we know of in current celebrity status by certain actors would be missed. Though influencers are probably more grotesque to some (including myself).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 03:46:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47408357</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47408357</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47408357</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "Hollywood Enters Oscars Weekend in Existential Crisis"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agreed. To say "good riddance" to Hollywood scares me. Like we are giving up and accepting generated slop and influencers from now on. There's a lot of bad movies, but just as you said, very few mediums have thusly pierced through across cultures and societies quite like Hollywood.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 18:43:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47390468</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47390468</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47390468</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "A most elegant TCP hole punching algorithm"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I like your comment, but it seems the author acknowledged this as a caveat to the algorithm.<p><i>>Many home routers try to preserve the source port in external mappings. This is a property called “equal delta mapping” – it won’t work on all routers but for our algorithm we’re sacrificing coverage for simplicity.</i><p>So to what percentage is this coverage sacrificed exactly? No idea. Not as useful if the percentage is high, as you are implying.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 17:40:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47389754</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47389754</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47389754</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "MacBook Neo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"good laptops" yes. But I haven't seen a "great" one in a very long time. The Windows market is asleep at the wheel and a copilot button is not going to resuscitate it.<p>I think the Surface is as close to great as you can get. I'm not saying that I know the whole market of laptops, you probably know better. But the Surface is pretty good, which is weird because it seems like Microsoft isn't really focusing on it or even backing away from it.<p>I agree with the parent, that Macbooks are way ahead in terms of usability, polish and charm for a laptop. And the performance is outright stellar.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 16:43:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47250135</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47250135</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47250135</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "MacBook Neo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><i>> Other than Microsoft nobody even makes decent laptops in the Windows world.</i><p>I completely agree. I actually quit like and get along with my Surface Laptop. It's a really nice computer overall, worthy. It's the closest you get to the same polish and usability that Apple has in their macbooks.<p>I absolutely love my M4 macbook pro, it's definitely the best laptop I've ever owned. I had an older macbook pro that I kept way past its lifetime too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 16:27:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47249857</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47249857</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47249857</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "AI is destroying open source, and it's not even good yet [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well, it <i>should</i> be the approver of the PR, not the author (AI slop or human slop) that is accountable. I don't ever want an AI to auto-approve a PR (or maybe only for very small things, like dependency-bot kind of tasks).<p>Not saying that's how it's done, in terms of accountability. The skin-in-the-game thing is hopefully still present, even with AI. But you're right, there's risk.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 23:31:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47130595</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47130595</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47130595</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "AI is destroying open source, and it's not even good yet [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You overestimate my ability to keep mental context for 6 months.<p>And additionally, most of the PRs I have seen reviewed, the quality hasn't really degraded or improved since LLMs have started contributing. I think we have been rubber stamping PRs for quite sometime. Not sure that AI is doing any worse.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 19:04:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47127071</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47127071</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47127071</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "Don't create .gitkeep files, use .gitignore instead (2023)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This used to happen a lot. But I don't think that many modern builders require existing directory these days.<p>Your point is valid though. It would be much preferable to include build/ in your root .gitignore so that the directory is never tracked.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 21:29:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47104993</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47104993</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47104993</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "Don't create .gitkeep files, use .gitignore instead (2023)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Both points here are appreciated. One that a README file as a "placeholder" for a directory gives the opportunity to describe why said empty directory exists. I would be slightly concerned though if my build process picked up this file during packaging. But that's probably a minor concern and your point stands.<p>Additionally, the AI comment is ironic as well. It's like we're finally writing good documentation for the sake of agents, in a way that we should have been writing all along for other sentient consumers. It's funny to see documentation now as basically the horse instead of the cart.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 21:26:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47104958</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47104958</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47104958</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by taftster in "Don't create .gitkeep files, use .gitignore instead (2023)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree with you. Empty .gitignore would be a "smell" to me. Whereas .gitkeep tells me exactly what purpose it serves. I like the semantic difference here that you describe. I don't like when multiple .gitignore files are littered throughout the codebase.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 21:20:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47104902</link><dc:creator>taftster</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47104902</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47104902</guid></item></channel></rss>