Isn't it usually associated with the business sphere rather than the personal sphere?

I don't think equal labor force participation has been a thing for that meant decades.

They matter rather less if the goal is to have useful software.

.

There's also the possibility that you make something commercially valuable, and forbid corporations from deriving value from it; in which case you'll suddenly have to share space with something that's (somewhat?) interoperable and outside your control. As was seen in the news a few times when project owners got annoyed at cloud providers and tried to restrict them.

I'd imagine that just because they've decided it's good enough to go public with it, doesn't mean it's done getting better. Or that someone else can't do it better, now that it's been shown to work.

Well there's that thing with some countries blocking like all of Cloudflare during sportsball matches, since Cloudflare deliberately makes it impossible to block only whichever of their customers are serving unlicensed sportsball streams.

And I think the "Great Firewall" is still a thing.

And IIRC there's a couple times I've heard about countries taking down connectivity entirely during civil-war / major-unrest type incidents.

Censorship is when Mallory decides that Alice is not permitted to talk to Bob.

Moderation is when Bob does not want to hear from Alice and Mallory blocks her for him.

The difference is on who's behalf the blocking is being done.

I would expect most people to not have much of an opinion on what other people are allowed to talk about when they're not around.

It cannot be usefully analogized to things you can experience (or even to other things you might already understand).

If you blindly assume it works and it doesn't, that's a problem.

If your process can handle it not working, it's much less of a problem.