<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: techno_tsar</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=techno_tsar</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:18:25 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=techno_tsar" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "TimeCapsuleLLM: LLM trained only on data from 1800-1875"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This does make me think about Kuhn's concept of scientific revolutions and paradigms, and that paradigms are incommensurate with one another. Since new paradigms can't be proven or disproven by the rules of the old paradigm, if an LLM could independently discover paradigm shifts similar to moving from Newtonian gravity to general relativity, then we have empirical evidence of an LLM performing a feature of general intelligence.<p>However, you could also argue that it's actually empirical evidence that general relativity and 19th century physics wasn't <i>truly</i> a paradigm shift -- you could have 'derived' it from previous data -- that the LLM has actually proven something about structurally similarities between those paradigms, not that it's demonstrating general intelligence...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 20:14:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46593603</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46593603</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46593603</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (Nov 2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm working on a Yelp alternative called Vibehuntr -- just something different to browse venues using Google's API, with a social layer so I can see what my friends like. It's very rough around the edges right now and it might be completely different by next week. It's been a fun experiment in vibe coding on a full stack. <a href="https://vibehuntr.io" rel="nofollow">https://vibehuntr.io</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2025 22:28:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45869831</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45869831</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45869831</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "Thoughts on thinking"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is unreadable slop.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 18:09:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44015972</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44015972</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44015972</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "Thoughts on thinking"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was thinking about how the point of reading isn't to literally 'internalize' what you've read. When you're engrossed in a piece of literature, you don't remember the specifics of the last page you read. What's more important is what the book is doing to your mind as you read -- it triggers a set of processes that force you to imagine and therefore form connections that you haven't made before, even if subtle and unrelated to the content of the book.<p>It's the same with writing. Writing isn't just a way to produce a good piece of writing, it's what the <i>process of writing</i> does to your brain as you think aloud, connecting words and sentences together. The same with painting, gardening, and organizing your stamp collection. The final 'product' isn't actually important. The significance lies in the process of immersion from the creator and the people who witness it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2025 18:07:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44015963</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44015963</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44015963</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "Computational Limit of Life May Be Billion Times Higher Than Assumed"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The 'capabilities' of simulated neural networks have nothing to do with consciousness.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 19:38:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43881539</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43881539</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43881539</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "Public Housing in Hong Kong"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have some family in Hong Kong that lived in public housing for the longest time. Some of the newer apartments were pretty good. 40th floor, nice view, free WiFi.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:47:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43385505</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43385505</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43385505</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "What ketamine does to the human brain"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree. You don't need someone's ketamine use to explain why they're a Nazi.<p>You know who else uses a lot of ketamine? The rave scene, the queer scene, and people treating PTSD. And those are some of the most un-Nazi folks out there.<p>It's a dissociative drug. It can be used recreationally, it can be used therapeutically, and of course, for medical purposes.<p>Let's be real. Why is Musk a megalomaniac? Because he <i>is</i> a megalomaniac. The end.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 01:46:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43339163</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43339163</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43339163</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "Is the TikTok ban a chance to rethink the whole internet?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>stuff like this gets taught in school? that’s like a take from the 1600s. literally descartes’s argument that animals are just automatons and only humans have minds.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2025 23:17:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42752218</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42752218</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42752218</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "“The Assayer” by Galileo Galilei (1623) [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Pretty much created the mind-body problem.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2024 18:16:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42009733</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42009733</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42009733</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "Ask HN: What are you working on (August 2024)?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is completely nuts. Well done.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2024 02:48:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41343940</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41343940</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41343940</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "The Webb Telescope further deepens the Hubble tension controversy in cosmology"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's a rigorous proof on Wikipedia, but there's simpler ways to show it.<p>For example, we know that 1/3 = 0.333...<p>3 * 1/3 = 3 * 0.333...<p>1 = 0.999...<p>You can also do it with subtraction. For example, 1 - 0.999... = x. Assuming x is greater than 0, then it should evaluate to 0.000...1.<p>But we can't have the digit 1 after an infinite number of zeros.  If there truly were a "1" after infinite zeros, it implies reaching the end of infinity, which is a logical contradiction. So x can't be greater than 0.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 03:44:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41242362</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41242362</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41242362</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "Friends are not a representative sample of public opinion"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What’s missing in the Gessen and Silver’s article here is that our ideological backdrop is largely realpolitik. If we’re talking about saying certain things to get re-elected, then yes, the notion of what public opinion is and how that affects potential votes is purely an academic matter. If it’s the case that Palestine alone will torpedo Biden’s re-election, then for sure he will change his tone.<p>But as Silver points out, it’s not obvious that Palestine is big enough of an issue to affect him. For the most part, Democrats run on being a big tent that represents teachers, unionists, college grads, progressives, globalists, democratic socialists, neoliberals, etc. It’s going to be watered-down, that’s a feature, not a bug. Trumpism is much more straightforward.<p>The irony in Gessen’s complaint is that the more “fringe” views you see on college campuses are largely correct in a narrow sense: <i>what’s happening in Gaza is a product of The West</i>. We are the Bad Guys. If you look at the world with no nuance whatsoever, then yes, binary logic would say Hamas are the Good Guys. Obviously, that’s insane.<p>But the colonial West analysis is fundamentally true. It’s true if we set our scope of history to the last century (British Mandatory Palestine) or the last 500 years. It’s true in an obvious sense, in how the US supports Israel today. Historians a thousand years from now will see The West as one long, colonial Empire, and Israel is its beachhead in the Middle East.<p>The “woke” kids on the campuses see this in a maximally socially constructivist sense, i.e, of course things like cops, oppression, capitalism, etc are all related to Gaza. So much of our way of life is built on violence… but if you’re a liberal (not a leftist!) you still believe you need these things to maintain society… Which is how you end up with Biden’s realpolitik neutrality, which means supporting Israel to <i>win</i> an election.<p>What Gessen ought to hope for is that public opinion does reach critical mass such that it is guaranteed that Biden <i>would be re-elected if he was pro-Palestine</i>. That is more or less their implicit desire: a free Palestine, but no Trump.<p>That is not impossible. But it will require a sustained political strategy from the ground up, not from the DNC. And the only viable political strategy is not one of utilitarian vote counting, because that’s what begets this kind of violence to begin with, but appealing to people’s pathos towards the suffering of others.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 05:15:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40375410</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40375410</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40375410</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "Friends are not a representative sample of public opinion"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Someone ought to write an article on Nate Silver’s straw manning in order to write this article.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 04:47:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40375270</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40375270</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40375270</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "When children become caregivers, who cares for them?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks for sharing. I saved your comment because it’s something I can see myself coming back to.<p>I can definitely relate to your story. Child of first generation immigrants. We had to move back to Hong Kong when I was 9 because my dad died and it was too difficult for a single mom in a new country to support us. When I was 18, I took advantage of my citizenship and moved back.<p>The constant pressure to find a way to take care of my mom has always been difficult for me, especially because it sometimes feels at odds with pursuing personal truths. I can go work for the bank, make sure mom is taken care of, but lose my own life. In my twenties, I spent some time living an “alt” lifestyle, working as a musician, and hanging out with B-listers in Beverley Hills. But I could never really enjoy it, not just because it was vapid, but because finding a way to truly secure a future for my mom was always in my mind. It was like wrestling with two sides of the American Dream. And no one around me could relate.<p>As I’ve gotten older the balance between “serving the parents” versus myself has become fuzzier. It’s obvious now that making sure my mom can enjoy the rest of the time she has is the right thing to do. But in turn, her expectations of me have relaxed. She understands that she’s raised a free, independent adult, and in the culture we live in, that’s a virtue.<p>It’s all so complicated, as I’m sure anyone who has had a similar upbringing would know, and the details are so specific to each person. But it’s good to know that it’s a common human experience.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 17:55:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40346176</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40346176</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40346176</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "The Myth of the Second Chance"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree. If you have two narratives about your life, and both are true, it is literally pointless to hang onto the negative one.<p>One's self-identity is important. The truth about what one's "narrative in life" is is not a brute property etched into the universe.<p>We should be pragmatic about what what thoughts we nurture.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 06:02:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40194960</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40194960</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40194960</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "Ten years of remembering every day that passes (2022)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Her actions have more to do with her psychology and less to do with her keeping a journal. A lot of people keep journals and it probably has the opposite effect. She sounds emotionally immature.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:32:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39494910</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39494910</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39494910</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "Baruch Spinoza and the art of thinking in dangerous times"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The assertion is not grounded in reality at all. It’s a common myth among people who live in a STEM echo chamber. Personally, I don’t know why people who haven’t even done more than a cursory overview of philosophy feel entitled to make meta philosophical claims. My only explanation is that it’s a way to defend a dogma of naive scientism. Why? I don’t know, probably the same reasons why people cling onto religion.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2024 22:16:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39308552</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39308552</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39308552</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "Gödel, Escher, Bach is the most influential book in my life (2022)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What part of Plato are you referring to? Republic is honestly written at a 10th grade English reading level. The most esoteric work of Plato is Timaeus, but most people do not see that as a foundational text in Western philosophy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 01:43:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39256378</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39256378</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39256378</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "I don't want anything your AI generates"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don’t interpret this discussion as about absolving oneself of responsibility. To be fair, what people spend their weekends doing is none of my business.<p>But it is <i>true</i> that Netflix makes UI decisions that encourage binging. They are not evil for doing so, because honestly, there isn’t anything wrong with binging anyway, but it’s indicative of the logic that is going to be used when it comes to producing their own shows.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 09:06:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39214031</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39214031</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39214031</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by techno_tsar in "OpenAI's board has fired Sam Altman"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>Search process underway to identify permanent successor.<p>Put me in, coach.<p>As someone deeply entrenched in the realms of AI development and ethical considerations, boasting a robust leadership background, I stand poised to lead OpenAI into its next phase of innovation and ethical advancement. My tenure navigating the intersection of AI research, business acumen, and ethical frameworks provides a unique foundation. Having spearheaded AI initiatives that upheld ethical standards while fostering groundbreaking technological advancements, I bring a proven track record of synthesizing innovation with responsible AI practices. My commitment to leveraging AI for the betterment of society aligns seamlessly with OpenAI's ethos, ensuring a continued pursuit of groundbreaking advancements in AI while maintaining a steadfast commitment to ethical, transparent, and socially responsible practices.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 20:36:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38309761</link><dc:creator>techno_tsar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38309761</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38309761</guid></item></channel></rss>