<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: tehnub</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=tehnub</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 16:21:39 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=tehnub" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "Googlebook"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's a common rhetorical technique that never convinces me. I'm not convinced this guy's anecdote is an exception to some rule.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 01:04:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48116641</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48116641</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48116641</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "Software engineering may no longer be a lifetime career"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>If the models are good enough, you will simply get outcompeted by engineers willing to trade their long-term cognitive ability for a short-term lucrative career<p>> (2) AI-users thus become less effective engineers over time, as their technical skills atrophy<p>Wouldn't (2) imply that if everyone just used AI there eventually would come a time when there aren't engineers who will outcompete you (because their skills are so atrophied)?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 16:55:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48097522</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48097522</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48097522</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "I built a Game Boy emulator in F#"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting, enjoyable post. Like the bit about data modeling. I've been dabbling in some OCaml and that kind of modeling is the best part. Also interesting to learn of CAMLBOY. Feedback to the author: Skip the AI edit step. I'd have preferred grammar errors or inelegance to what we have here, which is a bit stale.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 05:58:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47971668</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47971668</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47971668</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[How to Build an Agent Or: The Emperor Has No Clothes (2025)]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://ampcode.com/notes/how-to-build-an-agent">https://ampcode.com/notes/how-to-build-an-agent</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817255">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817255</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 16:40:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://ampcode.com/notes/how-to-build-an-agent</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817255</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47817255</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Books I Like: SICP]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://users.cms.caltech.edu/~mvanier/blog/sicp/">https://users.cms.caltech.edu/~mvanier/blog/sicp/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809508">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809508</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 19:15:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://users.cms.caltech.edu/~mvanier/blog/sicp/</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809508</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809508</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "Neanderthals survived on a knife's edge for 350k years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I just read this <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cajamarca" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cajamarca</a><p>It seems like the Incans were overconfident and didn't expect a surprise attack (didn't have their weapons, only a small retinue around the rule in ceremonial garb instead of armor), and then the 8000 warriors were outside and didn't even attempt to fight the Spaniards because they were so demoralized.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 06:26:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47597535</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47597535</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47597535</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "Slop is not necessarily the future"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Brilliant<p>>Sure, if you mess up and one of the houses collapses then that'll manifest as an outcome that impacts the home owner negatively.<p>lol</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 23:51:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595017</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595017</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47595017</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "Slop is not necessarily the future"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are plenty of furniture makers that use all hardwood construction. It's just that they charge like $10K USD for a cabinet</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 23:36:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594891</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594891</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594891</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "OkCupid gave 3M dating-app photos to facial recognition firm, FTC says"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This incident was from 2014. I wonder how many OKCupid employees and shareholders from then are still at/invested in the company. What do corporate punishments do if the people who made the mistake aren't even there to receive them?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 22:57:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594577</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594577</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47594577</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "A Faster Alternative to Jq"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've been using jj, which apparently is also faster than jq <a href="https://github.com/tidwall/jj" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/tidwall/jj</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 14:47:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543289</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543289</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47543289</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "Rob Pike’s Rules of Programming (1989)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's probably tons of stuff people use that is way slower than it needs to be but speed isn't one of their self-reported burning problems because they don't even realize it could be faster. pip vs uv?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 15:43:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47441357</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47441357</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47441357</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "Rendezvous with Rama"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nah we're not doing prequel hate in 2026</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 23:11:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47317054</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47317054</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47317054</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "Why Go Can't Try"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why Article By AI?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 18:57:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47222408</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47222408</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47222408</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "Ladybird adopts Rust, with help from AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wouldn’t because idiomatic Haskell is way slower than idiomatic Rust.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 17:40:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47125697</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47125697</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47125697</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "Brookhaven Lab's RHIC concludes 25-year run with final collisions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They’re using big things to do experiments. Maybe they discover some new physical effect. How do you know that that effect couldn’t be demonstrated in some smaller scale experiment after it’s understood better?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 00:48:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46930094</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46930094</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46930094</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "Brookhaven Lab's RHIC concludes 25-year run with final collisions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't think that argument holds up. See quantum mechanics.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 22:44:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46929005</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46929005</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46929005</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "My AI Adoption Journey"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How can people still make such mistaken analogies when ChatGPT was released over three years ago?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 00:13:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46919926</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46919926</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46919926</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "My AI Adoption Journey"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Totally on point, except I'm pretty sure Jobs was not like that. From what I've read he'd be more of a hands on "agentic engineer". Baby-sitting his engineers and designers and steering them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 23:16:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46919481</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46919481</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46919481</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tehnub in "Review of 1984 by Isaac Asimov (1980)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think Asimov is right that 1984 was not intended as a forecast but rather a depiction of Stalinism with British characteristics, so to speak.<p>>In short, if 1984 must be considered science fiction, then it is very bad
science fiction.<p>Based on this quote and others, it seems Asimov didn't believe that Orwell intended the novel as science fiction, although others categorize it that way. I would say he's attacking the interpretation of it as science fiction, but it veers into an attack on Orwell, which is unfortunate.<p>You write<p>>Science fiction does not _forecast_.<p>Not to be overly pedantic but to be fair to Asimov, he didn't exactly say science fiction _necessarily_ does that, but rather it's a knack related to science fiction.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 07:05:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46909980</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46909980</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46909980</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sublime Merge]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.sublimemerge.com/">https://www.sublimemerge.com/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46890167">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46890167</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 19:05:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.sublimemerge.com/</link><dc:creator>tehnub</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46890167</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46890167</guid></item></channel></rss>