Hacker News: tepmoc

New comment by tepmoc in "Claude Session URL appended to commit messages and PR descriptions by default"

tepmoc — Sat, 05 Sep 2026 05:26:47 +0000

I found using just skill isnt enogh. You have to bounce its turn and inject skill text to actually follow instructions 100%.

Because even if you use PreToolUse hook and don't bounce it, it will never work since skill text is injected when along with text that already perpared to it need to be edited.

New comment by tepmoc in "Anthropic banned me for "suspicious signals""

tepmoc — Wed, 02 Sep 2026 10:09:38 +0000

My first ban was 3 weeks ago after 5 months of usage.

And ban came after 6-8 hours of last session. My guess they didn’t like that I asked to verify RCE opus found, so he made workable exploit.

Everything else similar to your workflow, no token maxing and etc.

New comment by tepmoc in "Fastpotify"

tepmoc — Tue, 01 Sep 2026 12:14:44 +0000

Then, just do not add text that adds no value. Less is more.

Documentation is first part people see when presented. I personally hate AI written text even though I do agentic engineering a lot as well. Any user facing documentation must be reviewed, if you snoozy by reading it - remove or rewrite.

I do not care about paragraph long comments in code, because I’m not gonna read them, but I still follow my internal guideline and cut all this verbosity to level where it readable using hooks and skills.

So basicly like you said if you care about product do not add placeholders. It’s take away first impression.

New comment by tepmoc in "Cheap GPS jammers are filling the world with navigation dead zones"

tepmoc — Tue, 01 Sep 2026 06:41:49 +0000

They all within same close tied frequency range, so it’s pretty easy. Though L1,L2,L5 need separate jammers if you only target GNSS

New comment by tepmoc in "Claude Session URL appended to commit messages and PR descriptions by default"

tepmoc — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:26:25 +0000

I surprised how many people don’t even read their own PR commits and diffs, like at basic level.

So many don’t even bother to tide-up fold their commits into single logical change, consider how many commit agent doing, seems logical to have folded commit history when you open PR.

Default commit and PR body text is word salad didn’t seems to bothered these people. Because if it did they already had hooks and skills to make it look tidy and lack of any AI attribution inserted.

I don’t even consider myself developer more like really weak devops guy, but I was already doing all of that.

New comment by tepmoc in "Claude Session URL appended to commit messages and PR descriptions by default"

tepmoc — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:18:32 +0000

I found both models produce word salad for PR bodies by default. Same thing with commits messages.

I had to create hooks that invoke skills when pushing new commit and open PR body text.

New comment by tepmoc in "Claude Session URL appended to commit messages and PR descriptions by default"

tepmoc — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:01:14 +0000

Not really. Co-signed is part of system promt that injected by harness.

New comment by tepmoc in "Ubiquiti Flex Mini 2.5G Review Ubiquiti Does a Cheap 5-Port 2.5GbE Switch"

tepmoc — Sun, 16 Nov 2025 16:12:54 +0000

lots of low end switches use RTL837x series as basis nowadays

New comment by tepmoc in "Ubiquiti Flex Mini 2.5G Review Ubiquiti Does a Cheap 5-Port 2.5GbE Switch"

tepmoc — Sun, 16 Nov 2025 16:11:19 +0000

its basically AISC plus microcontroller - https://svanheule.net/switches/rtl8370

New comment by tepmoc in "HTTPS by default"

tepmoc — Wed, 29 Oct 2025 12:30:03 +0000

I love https, but I also hate that its basically killed on-site caching and give CDNs more power as its only way to distribute content closer to user

New comment by tepmoc in "Using CAA Records with Namecheap"

tepmoc — Sat, 19 Apr 2025 07:00:35 +0000

First time, eh? I remeber namecheap had problems 10 years ago when they upgraded interface and something was wrong with dns srv records. So i had to move out to gandi at time

New comment by tepmoc in ".localhost Domains"

tepmoc — Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:52:01 +0000

eh, you can just add search domain via dhcp or static configuration and just type out http://mything/ no need to enter whole domain unless you need todo ssl

New comment by tepmoc in "What would happen if we didn't use TCP or UDP?"

tepmoc — Tue, 25 Feb 2025 10:28:27 +0000

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41488416

New comment by tepmoc in "What would happen if we didn't use TCP or UDP?"

tepmoc — Tue, 25 Feb 2025 10:26:38 +0000

Diameter in mobile network is heavy user of SCTP, but from what I've read they moving away from diameter into HTTP calls for 6G.

Windows Task Manager Shows Misleading Values

tepmoc — Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:37:39 +0000

Article URL: https://aloiskraus.wordpress.com/2025/02/09/windows-task-manager-shows-misleading-values/

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43004840

Points: 4

# Comments: 0

New comment by tepmoc in "OpenWrt 24.10.0 – First Stable Release"

tepmoc — Thu, 06 Feb 2025 16:13:54 +0000

As previous owner of Archer C7, Archer AX23 barely upgrade if you want to install additional packages as it have same 16/128 flash/memory configuration just like C7.

Personally I upgraded to xiaomi Router AX3200 with 128/256 flash memory configuration and 4:4 MIMO, though it lacks USB and have WAN+3LAN ports compare to usual WAN+4LAN.

New comment by tepmoc in "QUIC is not quick enough over fast internet"

tepmoc — Mon, 09 Sep 2024 13:51:51 +0000

residential - not many. Corporate on other hand is different story, thus why happy eyeballs for transport still would needed to gradual rollout anyway.

New comment by tepmoc in "QUIC is not quick enough over fast internet"

tepmoc — Mon, 09 Sep 2024 13:37:17 +0000

SCTP still have some donwsides it has to resolve https://http3-explained.haxx.se/en/why-quic/why-tcpudp#why-n...

Plus we need happy eyeballs for transport if SCTP run over IP and not encapuslated https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-grinnemo-taps-he

But IPv4 pretty much non-workable since most end-users behind NAT and there no known implementation to work around that.

New comment by tepmoc in "QUIC is not quick enough over fast internet"

tepmoc — Mon, 09 Sep 2024 12:19:22 +0000

SCTP works fine on internet, as long your egress is comming from public IP and you don't perform NAT. So in case IPv6 its non issue at all unless you sit behind middle boxes.

Probably best approuch would be is like happy eye balls but for transport. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-grinnemo-taps-he

New comment by tepmoc in "macOS Sequoia Preview"

tepmoc — Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:26:55 +0000

WinUI essentially webpage