The dispute here is balancing people's human right to wank anonymously against the right of parents (and society's?) to limit access to (absurdly) age inappropriate material.

What does "ready for" even mean, when is anyone ready for 4k German BDSM.

There's also this slippery slope argument that preserving the former right is absolutely necessary to prevent creeping fascism. Which is absurd. Shouldn't it be the responsibility of the wankers to create some palatable solution to the conflict of interests, rather than demand the parents figure out how such wankers can preserve their anonymity?

Parenting is necessary for continuation and health of society. 4k German stuff is not.

Epic wanted their own store and they got their own store. It cost them and Apple a bunch of money, which indirectly is not good for anyone's customers... my sense of justice is not perplexed as to why they are not allowed back in.

Would you want to do business with someone who just sued you after breaking their previous contract with you?

What (language/topic) are you coding in that gemini (or even chatgpt) is better than claude? Very surprised to hear this.

Do the NATO agreements specify American armaments? Europe could have spent on European armaments and armies too, just chose not too because they didn't see a reason to.

Europe not buying F35 or whatever hurts US arms industry, but probably not the general strategic position of the US. There's even a credible argument (dont know how credible?) that these arms programs actually undermine security by investing crazy money in outdated / ineffective technology. The dumb part would be not learning from the Ukrainians how to fight a modern war.

US participation in NATO may be made redundant, but Europe's need for a credible collective defense agreement is not going away.

In order to have a viable business model they need to create value for users. Users are intelligent and will not even consider trying something that has no exit path, should the company disappear.

What every company hopes to have is customers who are thrilled with the value they deliver and tell everyone what a great deal it is so the company can grow.

What no company hopes for is to end up like hashicorp, where they end up spending more investment $ than the value they provide, never achieve profitability, and eventually just piss everyone off, and everyone is trying to make the best of a leveraged situation, they end up having to pull the rug. The user's leverage in that situation is something like opentofu, made possible by the license, same as what's being offered here.

The price of the big columnar dbs is very high, so there's a lot of ground to capture / value to arbitrage/offer in this space - as evidenced by other comments in this thread, how fast the benchmarks are changing, the likelihood of memory prices coming down, etc.

Aside from that, you have to wonder big picture if the AI space will put significant downward pressure on memory and compute prices with everyone wanting to run local LLMs, might change some fundamental tradeoffs made in db systems. If in 10 years I can get a phone with a 1 TB of fast access RAM to ask siri how to sauté mushrooms, what will 99% of us need columnar store for?

> legislation is kind of the point of a government

As an American, most of this post reads like doublespeak satire. I guess it's not, but just to put a transatlantic pov here.

I'll add a sports metaphor for good measure: in order to become expert football players, we'll get tickets to watch the best teams play.