<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: testerteert000a</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=testerteert000a</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 20:56:22 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=testerteert000a" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by testerteert000a in "EU Commission: addictive design Instagram and Facebook in breach of the DSA"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> all of the recent academic literature<p>The academic literature funded by what grants from what stakeholders? Like the social media research from Harvard Kennedy now? The research that came after its social media research lead was fired and a $500mm Chan Zuckerberg Initiative grant occurred somehow in parallel [0] [1]?<p>That recent research?<p>Or the research that was occurring on social media before that? Surely you're not arguing in that bad of faith, despite where I could speculate your RSUs might have came from. But this seems an extremely naive take if not made in bad faith.<p>[0] <a href="https://www.thecrimson[.]com/article/2023/2/2/donovan-forced-leave-hks/" rel="nofollow">https://www.thecrimson[.]com/article/2023/2/2/donovan-forced...</a>
[1] <a href="https://www.npr[.]org/2023/12/04/1217086770/disinformation-researcher-says-harvard-pushed-her-out-to-protect-meta" rel="nofollow">https://www.npr[.]org/2023/12/04/1217086770/disinformation-r...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:57:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48861686</link><dc:creator>testerteert000a</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48861686</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48861686</guid></item></channel></rss>