<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: tgraf_80</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=tgraf_80</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 14:50:37 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=tgraf_80" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tgraf_80 in "Chat is a bad UI pattern for development tools"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Truly speaking, you can use AI for a little bit higher abstraction and ambiguity, but not much. For instance, if you need an iteration over an array and you want to do a very specific aggregation you can instruct AI to write this loop but you yourself need to understand exactly what it’s doing and have a very clear idea how this code snippet fits into the larger picture</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 17:42:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42935862</link><dc:creator>tgraf_80</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42935862</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42935862</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tgraf_80 in "I am rich and have no idea what to do"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If the last sentence had been: Probably I will never figure that out. Then I would have said that you are on the right track.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 09:02:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42583936</link><dc:creator>tgraf_80</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42583936</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42583936</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tgraf_80 in "My PhD advisor rewrote himself in bash (2010)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>it's a way to express steps in a continuum (given by the context):
- not close (1)
- close (2)
- very close (3)
- arrived (4)
That's how language works. It's not mathematics and uses "salt and pepper" to convey the message as accurately as possible.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2024 13:29:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42423289</link><dc:creator>tgraf_80</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42423289</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42423289</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tgraf_80 in "My PhD advisor rewrote himself in bash (2010)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good intentions, indeed. Creating lots of steering committee slides, I know about the wish from the audience of a simpler language. But ‘very close’ is different from ‘close’. It’s not just salt and pepper but trying to articulate a complex and nuanced reality. And yes, research papers then sound a bit less solid and complete- sorry, but often this is the reality you should not hide.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 11:46:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42416440</link><dc:creator>tgraf_80</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42416440</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42416440</guid></item></channel></rss>