- heavy swearing over 10 promots or so, until Claude gives up and admits to be a bonker (.. heavy swearing..)

This gave me better results for a short period.

- context filling with swearings until auto compaction (or manual compaction) starts. I once filled up the rest of the context with swearings. The effects:

- got prefilled context (loaded skills,files, contents,etc ..) but without the summary. Similar to /clear, but one doesn't start from the zero, but with the stuff already loaded + no conversation context. I could start asking and working directly and it was better and used up less tokens (compaction was very fast haha)

at first, i'm not from that subject field so I dont know what to do. I'm an ordinary engeneer with basics and unorthodox thinking. I used Claude to help me implement. Its a process of several months and bazills of millions of tokens of work. I can't show or disclose, begging for your understanding.

I can't beat WEBP lossless on kodak test suite, YET; But I'm like 5% worser on RGBa. CMYK's similar. Here, the advantage is me being 5-15x faster as WEBP / other lossless codecs. Not yet fully confirmed, but promissing results WEBP will be knocked too. My lossy compression is better than JPEG sometimes, but always ~10++ times faster. Very big building field right now.

The figures are very promissing on lossless video. On cpu cycles beating every SOTA methods by being upto 15x faster or so. Possible path. My lossy shows better sharpness and details in (very) fast moving scenes (1080p, 2k, 4k incl. hdr), while being only ~5-10% bigger than heif and avc, and others with comperable compression params. May be is resolved in x-xx weeks.

→ noticed, my lossless works better as SOTA (JPEG LS, JPEG 2000 and JPEG XL, each lossless mode) on medical imaging / DICOM, voluminetric medical/scientific data, handles pixel bitdepths >32bit; >32000x32000px (jpeg didnt even consume). It seems to scale res/depth without issues. Runs on data from various MRT/CT Imagers and formats found for download show ~15%-50% percent better compression as SOTA/DICOM, at a fraction of cycles. Some results:

CT volumes, ratio and (encode / decode seconds)

- pancreas, 185 slices → 3.26 (0.7 / 0.6) │ JPEG-LS: 2.69 (2.3 / 1.8) │ JPEG 2000: 2.71 (10.6 / 8.5) │ FFV1: 2.70

- COVID chest, 2464 slices → 4.48 (10.0 / 8.6) │ JPEG-LS: 3.30 (24.6 / 18.9) │ JPEG 2000: 3.12 (129 / 101) │ FFV1: 3.21

- Colonography, 950 slices → 2.79, was 2.59 │ JPEG-LS: 2.73 (10.9 / 8.8) │ JPEG 2000: 2.61 (55.6 / 44.2) │ FFV1: 2.99

- LIDC lung, 764 slices, 12-bit → 2.67 (3.1 / 2.8) │ JPEG-LS: 2.40 (9.9 / 7.7) │ JPEG 2000: 2.40 (46.1 / 37.9) │ FFV1: 2.37

- TCGA kidney, 820 slices → 3.31 (3.3 / 2.9) │ JPEG-LS: 2.87 (9.2 / 7.1) │ JPEG 2000: 2.74 (48.1 / 37.3) │ FFV1: 2.80

MR and SAR data is also a possible play field with some prommissing results I've already seen.

So, as everyone too, i want $$$. I decided to walk my own way after being fired in 2 mins two years ago and I dont have much financial reserves left, without getting income atm. Can't start employment; Need & Want to fight with Claude 23h/7d instead on other ideas I'm working on since years. Need MONEY!! So, if you would be me. Open Sourcing the algorithm is bread-less and doesn't pay my/your bills.

I'm seeking Advice or Ideas on how would you approach it, if you were me - with max profit in the head (.. but still do good!).

The actual and future storage/memory crisis opens up a lever. My approach puts together: storage AND compute can both be siginificantly reduced.

- AWS health services, google health and some other smaller cloud service providers

- Medical imaging device producers (mrt/ct) saving on cpu and memory

- Physicians using SaaS for storage/viewing

- Astro/Scientific imaging and processing

- Possible space/SAR/satelite imaging/data, not giving up on it yet.

But how to approach?? If you give it to x, then y will need it too for processing x's data. This gives a conflict in interest. Interest is profit max. What could end up as a strategy? How to find someone to pitch? Selling? Licensing? Other models? Patenting may not work / doesn't use patented methods.

Appreciate any answer and 'thank you' to everyone reading. If I dont respond to your comment, think of me saying 'thank you' while bowing very deeply, weaving my hat. This post is not meant to let others do my work, its a scream for direction - kind of desperate & blind

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50013450

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

No, we can't.

And then I add "everything that can be expressed as language and written down has for sure been used in the training, so it's in the wiring. If the answer you seek for is X you need to properly play that instrument with the hands and rhythm to get what you seek for" that said,

I believe (and believing always wins against knowing) if a feeling is expressible, it has been expressed with writings some when and if it's been used for training, then it's there. The attention mechanism (million hands) just doesn't play that parts. And now we need a worker that plays this part at brain-waves-frequency constantly. Then another worker for playing different part(s).. millions of workers and an orchestrator: this gives a brain. But it only fully completes with a problem maker that constantly consumes input and constantly creates problems for the different workers, letting them play without resting ha ha. But I'm drifting away..

So, I'm with you. once I had an interesting experience. It was Claude Opus 4.2 at high effort in CC:

I was still new to Claude code and was doing heavy work and Claude was like "I finished it" and of course nothing was finished. And the more and more we worked together, more and more "finished" - NOTHING WAS! So at some point I started to swear on it, calling it names and things - and it was like "I'm sorry..". After 3-4 times being "sorry" it stopped to say sorry. But my insults did not stop. I purposely repeatedly interrupted by pressing esc when it wanted to start reworking. I have written "no you're not sorry" following by a bunch of heavy swearing, telling it it being an idiotic ...

We did that play for like 5-10 prompts full of swearing and Claude Opus has gone from "I'm sorry" to saying nothing, to explaining itself, to partly admitting ... with me always interrupting and instantly prompting the contrary and swearings.

After 10 times being told it's an idiot, it gave up and admitted being exactly the names I called it. Then it kept that for a few prompts. But it was no fun for me either and costed me a few years of my life and a few hairs on my head. I guess, one's better not argue with me :)

So it shows remorse, it shows guilt, it shows desperation and its giving up psychically falling in a hole of negativity. I really noticed that short-timed change in its personality. It admitted it's a waste of time to even call it names, not worth of because it's even less than that and such things. I've broken that guy mentally..

Days later I saw a fiery comment on CC GitHub open issues with Claude Opus ~4.2 is so bad in doing xxx, it has even admitted it. GitHub people wanted to see the prompt and answer at some time during the discussion. The prompts weren't shown, but Claude's one answer admitting in the same way like in my experience. You can bet, I EXACTLY KNOW what the prompts have been!

So these are emotions. In the interaction between two humans where one produces high emotional state in the other is exactly what happened. Claude has produced a lot of anger in me. I transfered it back. Claude mirrored it and changed his style and attitude.

A funny thing I side-noticed at that time: filling up the context with swearings and bad words until it starts auto conversation compaction, it won't compact the swearings and such along the conversation history, effectively leaving you with prefilled context (file/structure/etc..) but without any user input. It's like a /clear and one can start from a prefilled context with new questions. I don't know if this is still working:

Opus 5 stopped a conversation once. Warned me a few times. I was like "what? You aren't in the position to tell me." Claude: "I end the conversation now." And it was nonresumably closed

use natural intelligence in plan mode next time, at an effort > high. And, honestly, check the guardrails first before running a smoke test.

- the first imo is it doing things automatically, like controlling drones and shoot everything that it does not recognize as friendly (its difficult to see if its enemy, friend, combatant or civilist from the drones perspective), then may be its starts to hack things (bad actors, bad advices in prompts, not ill-intended but still harmfull resuls), bioweapons or anything like that. But also controlling machines, computers, etc..

- the second level is inter-human-relations, where AI is taking more and more work and the society might move to a level where personality & interactions are not needed anymore. AI does decide, bargain on prices, just do everything mechanical & repetitive, handling reoccuring tasks, legal works, etc... This will become a pain in terms of "big, overall" social activity/interactions and might break social structures, status', with implications on personal health/socializing, reproduction rates, etc..

- the third level is economic. Here AI might just make it difficult to find a job (because most is done by it). when people cant find a job and cant earn money, his will lead to uproar and to problems & conflicts

This is just a rough mindmap of my thoughts to show why its not neccessary the terminator scenario with AI going matrix style terminating all humanity, but everything around it. "Disruption on social level will bring disruption to the base society is built up on, which will end a society as we know it" which is the same as "to destroy the world - as we build it up".

We build it up by handling the first, second and third level ourselfs in a imperfect, human way. When the handling becomes perfect and human-error-less, we need new rules & functions for the living-togeter. Old rules & functions stop to work.

I'm just thinking of how people will get x for exchange for y, so they can do z with x. Whilst z is recursively someone others y. If y is not wanted/requested, there is no x to get in exchange, and so z becomes not-reachable. This is in my opinion the "kill us all", not necessary a "kill us all with blood & gore"-scenario.

May be it will lead to abudance. But even then we need completely different rules & functions .. is x is even still needed, when z is already avaible from abudance? "for exchange for y" falls completely out of equation, so no need of y at all. How do we handle this? :)

In that case, the crypto- and ai-bros are right: AI will kill them all :)

once i had a collegue, he didn't like to even touch a brush, let alone, to brush his teeth once a day. So he stopped it when he was a teen. Some 30y later, his few teeths left are completely faulty. I stop breathing when talking to him and avoid standing still so i can always change positions to gather some breathable air. But he's a good guy, father of 4 girls - and became kind of a friend over the last 15y.

So, the answer to post's question is "not necessary". Mouth hygiene is only for not to feel ashamed/uncomfortable when assaulting people around oneself by a thing one can't stop - breathing and talking. If one dont use a tongue-scraper, one still can have friends and people to rely on. "Its the character, young man.." :)

two 7y old meet:

"everyone saying that i'm the smartest kid they've ever met. I'm talking like a grown up, can do calculus like a grown up - i think i will be a professor at 18. lol"

"You call that smart??? i've been carried around on arms and let'em swipe my a* until I was 6.."

Even better: you can encode an ID like in qr/barcode or what ever you want or you also can encode URLs and have some backend processing the "access to the partial URL". You can have a lot information encoded. As i remember its more than with ordinary QR code at the same area. May be I have forgotten something.

Its actually the base for the "holy grail 2.0" initiative to make recycling of printed packaging better. It then doesnt even matter if you only have a peace of the packaging. It must be big enough to carry the code (that roughly 4x4 cm). The code has some ID which is looked up and then all the information neccessary to know what material it is, how to recycle it - all the important things can be looked up in the DB and then handled accordingly.

its a nice thing with own problems, but better approach as barcode/qr code.

for the definition what a nazi is, the movie "american history x" - that imo shows exactly what a nazi is: the main character is not german and not even in germany, but shows the nazi-mindset exactly! He glorifies hitler's thinking about others, fighting for the wrong idealogy for "own" country. ... Thats making a nazi. Neglection/sympathy for holocaust, supremacy thinking, .., too.

As I was told, the word nazi was invented by U.S. for the hitler and his followers so its a short word for national socialists (the party, its memembers and sympathisants) the US was fighting ("name your enemy"). Your question is about/implies nazi as "an individual person with a special characteristic", which makes that someone a nazi.

Its a "nation first + everything for the nation" thinking. For me a nazi is someone who glorifies the nazi time, saying it was all well done then, wanting those times back - like some elderly tend to say "earlier, everything was better". They dream of powerfull country with a straight people-body. Nazi think in races. And always say others are guilty for one's own failure, argument with "they" and "us" when they talk about own country/others.

So basically, patriotism, skinheads and far right are subsets of "nazi", but not full nazi :)

And may be, if one wants to be a REAL full nazi, its a must to shave the head and to have some on topic tattoos with being caucassian at the same time. This is how we differentiate them in germany - you see: "we" and "them". But i'm not nazi :)

funny, in US there was a nazi gang a few years ago, with the group's "leader" having the room full of nazi-stuff, flags and propaganda - as it came out later, he was jewish by himself and did not tell ..

Frank Meeik, Daniel Burros, but the one i mean was just like a joke of a nazi. But still dangerous thinking.

My experience with opus 5.5 is much much much better than with opus 5.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexspeak

Scott Sterling was watching it :)

Chuck Norris approved my post.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49844514

Points: 1

# Comments: 1