<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: thealexliang</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=thealexliang</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 05:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=thealexliang" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by thealexliang in "MacBook Pro with PROLED XDR Display and Touch"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What’s old is new again. Innovation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 18:45:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50278906</link><dc:creator>thealexliang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50278906</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50278906</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by thealexliang in "MacBook Pro with PROLED XDR Display and Touch"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For those HDR video editing / color grading specialists, how do these compare to Samsung + LG OLED TVs, Sony HDR Reference Monitors, or else?<p>I’ve always been interested in HDR video (HDR 10 +, Dolby Vision, HLG) and have wondered if the marginal upgrade in producer display quality  will further impact the consumer HDR consumption. Also I think it’s noteworthy that they showcase DaVinci Resolve instead of Final Cut Pro, which is their own non linear editor and color grading app.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 18:01:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50278106</link><dc:creator>thealexliang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50278106</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50278106</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by thealexliang in "Apple violated antitrust ruling, judge finds"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Apple willfully chose not to comply with this Court’s Injunction. It did so with the express intent to create new anti-competitive barriers which would, by design and in effect, maintain a valued revenue stream; a revenue stream previously found to be anti-competitive. That it thought this Court would tolerate such insubordination was a gross miscalculation. As always, the cover-up made it worse. For this Court, there is no second bite at the apple."<p>I'd recommend skimming through the whole thing because Judge Rogers just eviscerates Apple over and over.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 01:00:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43852544</link><dc:creator>thealexliang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43852544</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43852544</guid></item></channel></rss>