To expand your fortune relatively other people have to lose. Its required.

UVB shouldnt just be legal, it should be mandatory.

Personally i would like to see a more granual permission to drive based on performance, need and demography.

If you are going to prevent some-things we "know" are bad and your method is "known" to belong on that list the best you can hope for is a pyrrhic victory.

If we anticipate the worse case scenario on both ends the conclusion must be that we are terrible at such predictions.

But hey, if we let money guide us at least some will be happy with the result.

You can pay more of course, buy them a computer, an internet connecties, books, courses, even an office but it isnt required.

Just pay 60 per project every 4 weeks and ignore it. If interesting progress happens its fun to look at.

Even if all seats are full they dont make earth shaking profit that cant be avoided. The economy doesnt require doing it. The risk benefit ratio is off the chart.

People making such decisions should really be behind bars? I cant think of a better way to kill. Just send some plague ships and it will make short work.

Maybe if you do that for 1000 days some automation can find a pattern in it? I doubt it. Filtering out garbage hundreds of items at a time is definetly doable.

Currently i put up a visibility:hidden position:absolute left:-9000px div with nobr, put the first line of text in it, then get the width of it with computed style, calculate the root font size to make it the line exactly the screen width. Then the div is removed and the rest of the content is allowed on the page.

This is the only thing that works.

Like for example what business do people have learning how new your car is? Some even buy a new car to avoid the badge of shame.

Why do i need to know when your registration expires?

How times have changed

Edit: a legacy vibe coder

I can think of many marketing formulas that would definitely work but since the game is not legwork but propaganda the industry should just die.

I dont function like that. I have true, false and unknown.

If i prematurely promote an unknown to true or false i would feel the need to defend my uninformed conclusion. Since i dont have what it takes to do that i would try to spoof the data. I would also blind myself to everything that contradicts the opinion.

You, feynman, the septic communty, you have sunk to a level that wouldnt even be legal if the man was alive. Claims of fraud and first degree murder?!?!

Unlike the inventor such claims require evidence and until you have it the accused is innocent.

But lets compare the two cobtradicting stories. One claims the other unplugged the device and claimed he really wanted to hold the plug in his hand and politely asked. The other claimed the one to have unplugged it himself and refused to give it back.

Which one of the two would require settling out of court?

The debunking doesnt really talk about Papp. You can copy paste it under any exotic claim.

>if the motor had any merit, he could refuse the out-of-court settlement and demonstrate the working principles of his motor.

No reason to think any demonstration would change information-free debunking.

Well over a thousand geet engines were build, hundreds of youtube demostrations but it is still not considered real.

There are now respectable publications about the pons and fleishman device with 100% successful replication but it is still not considered real.

If you personally build a working Papp engine it would simply not be considered real. People would say you are a fraud and a murderer and that would be the final word on the topic.

Perhaps we will get to see a future where great offers beat large advertisement budgets. Im sure many want to switch to that formula.

People get even more mad if you tell them there are many reasons to think Joseph Papp created a mixture of noble gasses, injected into sealed pistons of conventional combustion engines and then those engines would run for 6 months without adding any other fuel.

Feynman was amoung the angry mob. After hearing about it he went to a demonstration involving a big volvo engine funded by the navy.

After 10 min he climbed onto stage pointed at some electronics plugged into the wall, he pulled the plug and playfully dangled it above papp who protested loudly and said it was not safe. Feynman ignored him until papp went into full panic. The plug was returned, papp put it back into the wall and the engine exploded. 7 people were injured, one lost a leg and one audience member died.

The dubious thing to me was that after much media exposure no one was interested in the physics.

Feynman oddly twists the story and said papp unplugged it and gave the plug to him. He wanted to hold it he said.

He also created a fantastic imaginary forensic report where he imagined papp put explosives in the engine.

After papp blamed him for destroying the engine they settled out of court.

The noble gas engine was now officially debunked.

https://hoaxes.org/comments/papparticle2.html

It gets more absurd where journalists and internet septics make an effort to change the story.

https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/28530/did-richa...

I generously give the Papp engine 0.1% odds of being useful technology which means we should be looking at the thousand claims of miraculous tech. If i look at the debunking there is never any evidence against them. Look at them fabricating, its quite amusing. Or do you see a single convincing argument the engine doesnt work even from the highly praised Feynman himself?