<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: theihtisham</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=theihtisham</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 17:15:27 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=theihtisham" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by theihtisham in "AI agent designs a complete RISC-V CPU from 219-word spec sheet in just 12 hours"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The interesting part isn’t “AI designed a CPU” so much as what counts as design completion here. For hardware, I’d want to separate spec interpretation, RTL generation, simulation coverage, synthesis results, timing closure, and debug effort after first failure. A lot of the real work shows up in the edges between those steps. If they can publish pass/fail criteria and the amount of human correction required after generation, that would make this much easier to evaluate.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 03:02:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47884982</link><dc:creator>theihtisham</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47884982</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47884982</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by theihtisham in "GPT-5.5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>i just installed Codex and And Gave try to GPT 5.5  Its Good As compare to previous one</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 02:34:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47884811</link><dc:creator>theihtisham</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47884811</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47884811</guid></item></channel></rss>