The article also seems to make the assumption that a server would be pulling 1000W all the time, 24/7, which is rarely the case (of course, I can't comment on what their workload might be, but it would be quite unlikely)

Still, I like the direct networking being done here. But saying "you can build a 10Gbps mesh for $50" when you have 3x $750+ machines seems a bit disingenuous. It is not unreasonable to get 10Gb SFP+ NICs on ebay for ~$50 a pop ($150 for 3)

If anyone has questions, feel free to ask.

Source: typing this on my Framework 13 AMD right now :)

Ultimately, I think having work-specific accounts is preferable, and I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of IT departments also prefer this (however, this is also coming from the medical space, where controls are rather tight and security is extremely important and heavily audited)

In the case of the Zimaboard, this is basically a 12V barrel jack with a different shape. It just dumps 12V out on the pins with no negotiation or considerations of the client device.

I suspect if the downstream device was already 12V compliant, it might survive, but I wouldn't count on that nor would I be willing to test it.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1bbD1kw334

Honestly, for me, total dealbreaker for a product like this. Not only will it never work with anything other than the original PSU, that PSU will likely fry anything else you plug it into.

A quick comment on UX - my laptop is old (see: the aforementioned ancient processor), and these types of menus are extremely inefficient for screen real-estate. On a 1366x768 display, most modern webapps/applications simply need that full screen real estate. They become unusable if you try to split in either direction (which I want to do oh so often, using a tiling window manager). Even when given the full screen resolution, some things are simply unusable.

I think a design like this is at risk of falling into the "always unusable" category for hardware like mine. Of course, I know this is just a demo, and context matters a lot, but I still think it's something worth considering.

If each menu item is 65px in height - on a 1366x768 display, once you account for taskbars, titlebars, browser tab interfaces, menu bars, etc, you'd probably be lucky to have about 500px of vertical real estate left for the main content. So you'd barely be able to shove ~7.5 elements on screen with a list like this. Just food for thought.

There are restrictions on NVENC streams with consumer cards, but that has been a solved problem for a while [0].

If they were to make a consumer card with more VRAM, it would immediately undercut their own Quadro/Tesla lineup, which cost substantially more. I don't see a reason for them to do it.

0: https://github.com/keylase/nvidia-patch

Of course, assuming you can just put your own ROM on it, it doesn't matter, but it just seems like so much work for little to no reason to me.