Which is explicitly against the 14th amendment.

If you knew this was all possible and you did it anyways for personal gain then you are additionally negligent which may add aggravation to your charges.

And what institution gives out the licenses for journalists and scientists? Is it revokable?

Time to set my VPN location to Germany. I'm tired of the "udm" trick.

Finally.

It's a bad analogy. Autopilot just maintains the aircraft in some state, then there's the flight director which maintains the flight path, and you can connect or disconnect the two at will. When connected the director can change the autopilot state.

To use the flight director you must fully specify your flight. The weight, the fuel, the weather, expected winds, takeoff and landing runway length, runway conditions, expected brake demand, as well as every single waypoint you're going to cross and the expected state at that crossing.

> what the human metaphor means

We learned after high levels of cockpit automation that maintaining situational awareness was still required. Pilots are freed of some stress during high workload portions of the flight, provided they planned correctly in advance, and that zero changes to their flight plan (not likely) occur.

As a result pilots are mostly told and trained to hand fly the plane during take offs and landings if the weather allows for it. You should only use high levels of automation if the situation demands it.

Then you might as well work for yourself.

> getting into this industry for the money

I can make more money doing HVAC but I'm tired of being on hot roofs.

> the path forward is a lot murkier.

If you're just here for the money go somewhere else. If you're here because you love computer science then ignore these people and do the work. If you can't find a company get a dayjob and do it for yourself.

Are you talking the big 10? Or "tech companies" in general?

> AI really just can't replace productive work

Okay. Show me the productivity gains. Those are measurable. Why is the "AI is ready" crowd never prepared to show this?

> that if an AI can do junior-engineer-level coding work

Then you have no competitive edge and most of your output probably cannot be copyrighted.

We are, in some sense, meant to accept the loss of our teeth, likely because it impacts lifetime energy efficiency in some way that we're not correctly observing yet.

Which is where the concept of "safe levels" come in. I should be able to install this module in such a way where file operations and process operations are not available to it. That being said, presumably, this types of infiltration would seem to be _much_ easier to spot. "Why is this web framework calling 'spawn'?"

> I just want a .zip with the binaries

I want a .zip with the _code_. Just the code. None of the packaging nonsense. My distribution can handle that.

Isn't there a way to make this an alias anyways?

You could equally argue that it's a way to optimize lifetime energy efficiency.

> The cells humans are made of are immortal,

Yes but DNA transcription is not error free and most body parts do not grow back after being lost, most perniciously, our teeth. Elephants grow 6 sets of them, but due to their diet, they can end up fully losing all their teeth before they die.

> it's dying of what you might call 99.9% victories against disease

The planet we live on is warmed by the Sun. The Sun's energy can also destroy our cells. It's not just disease.

If your distribution requires more than this, then it's not really a module, or combines too many non-modular components, and should be distributed differently.

The ability for npm to run scripts on any level should be removed.

Then we can go back to worrying about namespacing issues.

2 -- Space also belongs to the citizens and not the corporations.

3 -- The defense industry is the single worst most corrupt and idiotic industry we still shackle ourselves to.

Shouldn't your concern be whether it's true? Who asks to be "convinced?"

It's better than what preceded it but we still manage retirement wealth poorly.

The state government of California was doing a bang up job of destroying this project on their own. He didn't really need to help them. Moreover given the rise of remote work I'm not sure it has as much value as it would have had it been constructed when it was designed.

> but he's not dumb enough to actually believe all the bullshit he spouts.

Yet he's not afraid of the consequences either. This seems more telling to me.

"Did you notice anything odd about the defendants vehicle?"

"Yes."

"What was that?"

"He had disabled his GPS and telemetry systems."