Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3396763

Points: 2

# Comments: 1

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3393381

Points: 13

# Comments: 13

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3392944

Points: 4

# Comments: 2

The Swedish system does have aspects of corporatism in it. You may criticize those aspects, but they don't constitute corruption just because you don't like them. There's nothing secret or shady about them -- it's how the system is supposed to work.

Imagine if she was not only female, but a black, lesbian female. Why, she'd be worth billions!

No, but the mother lacks human value.

But it really doesn't matter what China was like 2000 years ago. What matters is what Asians are like _today_.

Of course, since universities have been turned into factories, robots are perfectly adapted to that environment.

Web based: http://bright-shadows.net

Console based: http://www.smashthestack.org/

http://www.dropmocks.com/mtfA

Also see this excellent article on the same subject: http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=2923

"When lower-class whites are matched with lower-class blacks and other non-whites the degree of the non-white advantage becomes astronomical: lower-class Asian applicants are seven times as likely to be accepted to the competitive private institutions as similarly qualified whites, lower-class Hispanic applicants eight times as likely, and lower-class blacks ten times as likely. These are enormous differences and reflect the fact that lower-class whites were rarely accepted to the private institutions Espenshade and Radford surveyed. Their diversity-enhancement value was obviously rated very low."