<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: throw0101d</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=throw0101d</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 17:11:59 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=throw0101d" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "Palantir employees are starting to wonder if they're the bad guys"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>Japan did not take part in the Holocaust.</i><p>* <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanjing_Massacre" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanjing_Massacre</a><p>* <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bataan_Death_March" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bataan_Death_March</a><p>* <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_731" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_731</a><p>* <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comfort_women" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comfort_women</a>  (Japan still ignores complaints to this day)<p>The Japanese viewed non-Japanese as sub-human. It is no different than Nazis viewing Jews, Slavs, <i>etc</i>, as sub-human.<p>> <i>The holocaust was a later addon (1940).</i><p>At least when it comes to the Nazis, genocide was always the general direction:<p>* <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost</a><p>The focus on Jews came a little later:<p>* <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wannsee_Conference" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wannsee_Conference</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 12:27:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47889280</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47889280</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47889280</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "Palantir employees are starting to wonder if they're the bad guys"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>The US has over 128 military bases in 55 foreign countries.</i><p>Are those 55 countries forced to have US military bases, or are they willing/happy to have them around?<p>Estonia wants more US troops:<p>* <a href="https://news.err.ee/1609992007/estonia-signals-willingness-to-host-more-us-troops" rel="nofollow">https://news.err.ee/1609992007/estonia-signals-willingness-t...</a><p>The Philippines is also good with the US expanding its presence:<p>* <a href="https://news.usni.org/2026/02/02/u-s-army-quietly-stands-up-rotational-force-in-the-philippines" rel="nofollow">https://news.usni.org/2026/02/02/u-s-army-quietly-stands-up-...</a><p>* <a href="https://time.com/6252750/philippines-us-military-agreement-china/" rel="nofollow">https://time.com/6252750/philippines-us-military-agreement-c...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 12:23:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47889247</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47889247</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47889247</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "Palantir employees are starting to wonder if they're the bad guys"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>Conquest from who?</i><p>The Communists. Would you rather live in North or South Korea?<p>Vietnam is interesting in that they're still politically authoritarian but willing to be more economically open; see also China. (Just don't say the wrong thing about the wrong people.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 12:17:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47889197</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47889197</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47889197</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "Palantir employees are starting to wonder if they're the bad guys"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>Very much the same as the USSR and China have done.</i><p>The expressed goal of Communism (USSR, later China) was to spread its ideology to the entire world. The US chose at its goal the containment of Communism:<p>* <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Article" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Article</a><p>* <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Containment" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Containment</a><p>This is what drove Korea, Vietnam, Cuba/Castro, and many other countries with left-leaning governments. In many cases this ended up with the US supporting the right-wing people, e.g.:<p>* <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augusto_Pinochet" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augusto_Pinochet</a><p>> <i>There's a reason the US has military bases across the globe. It's not because they've retreated from their subservient states.</i><p>Yes, containment and power projection to keep the sea lanes open for trade (which benefits the US financially and life-style-wise, but also benefits countries who export things, to the US and other places):<p>* <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSC_68" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSC_68</a><p>If you don't think having peaceful sea lanes is useful, see Houthis/Red Sea and Strait of Hormuz. What we're seeing with Trump's worldview is a return to how things tended to be earlier in history:<p>* <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercantilism" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercantilism</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 12:14:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47889171</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47889171</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47889171</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "Palantir employees are starting to wonder if they're the bad guys"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>On the changes to US military organization and thinking post-WW2 (and the name change):<p>> <i>[…] The United States has a Department of Defense for a reason. It was called the “War” Department until 1947, when the dictates of a new and more dangerous world required the creation of a much larger military organization than any in American history. Harry Truman and the American leaders who destroyed the Axis, and who now were facing the Soviet empire, realized that national security had become a larger undertaking than the previous American tradition of moving, as needed, between discrete conditions of “war” and “peace.”</i><p>> <i>These leaders understood that America could no longer afford the isolationist luxury of militarizing itself during times of threat and then making soldiers train with wooden sticks when the storm clouds passed. Now, they knew, the security of the country would be a daily undertaking, a matter of ongoing national</i> defense, <i>in which the actual exercise of military force would be only part of preserving the freedom and independence of the United States and its allies.</i><p>* <a href="https://archive.is/https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/09/defense-war-cringe-department/684112/" rel="nofollow">https://archive.is/https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive...</a><p>The author is a retired professor from the US Naval War College:<p>* <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Nichols_(academic)" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Nichols_(academic)</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 18:56:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47879998</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47879998</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47879998</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "US Department of Justice has officially reclassified cannabis as less dangerous"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>The right cannabis strains can do wonders for my mood, but it also makes me feel... less autistic</i> […]<p>Is it the same strain(s) for everyone, or does each person need to figure out which ones work for them?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 15:23:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47876852</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47876852</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47876852</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "Apple fixes bug that cops used to extract deleted chat messages from iPhones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>What about when my notifications are showing up on my MacBook next to the phone via mirroring?</i><p>See perhaps §iMessage and §Continuity in <i>Apple Platform Security</i>:<p>* <a href="https://help.apple.com/pdf/security/en_US/apple-platform-security-guide.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://help.apple.com/pdf/security/en_US/apple-platform-sec...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 13:27:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47875517</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47875517</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47875517</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "Email could have been X.400 times better"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>You could have been notified when the message was read a full 15 years before email had something similar tacked on.</i><p>Which spammers and marketers would have <i>loved</i>.<p>I have "load remote content" disabled on my e-mail client so that tracking graphics/pixels do not leak such information to the sender.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:38:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47875032</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47875032</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47875032</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "Another Day Has Come"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>An old Radio Shack ad from 1991 that often makes the rounds is illustrative:<p>* <a href="https://www.trendingbuffalo.com/life/uncle-steves-buffalo/everything-from-1991-radio-shack-ad-now/" rel="nofollow">https://www.trendingbuffalo.com/life/uncle-steves-buffalo/ev...</a><p>* <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45161816">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45161816</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 20:07:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47868609</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47868609</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47868609</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "What killed the Florida orange?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Meta: giving oranges as gifts at Christmas was a bit of a thing in the past when they used to be much more rare during winter: from Valencia/Ivrea for Europeans, and California/Florida in the US.<p>* <a href="https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/why-we-should-bring-back-tradition-christmas-orange-180971101/" rel="nofollow">https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/why-we-should-br...</a><p>In the US the Interstate system helped reduce shipping and logistic costs across state lines, and so oranges became more prevalent and less 'special' post-WW2.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:08:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47867901</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47867901</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47867901</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "Another Day Has Come"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>Inflation goes up - someone who could buy a $500 computer in 2008 should be able to buy a $766 or so computer today</i><p>It should also be noted that technological advances tend to be <i>de</i>flationary in general: regardless of real or nominal dollars, the chips/storage/etc you can buy today were sometimes not even available in the past at any price.<p>Edit: e.g., see 1991 Radio Shack add:<p>* <a href="https://www.trendingbuffalo.com/life/uncle-steves-buffalo/everything-from-1991-radio-shack-ad-now/" rel="nofollow">https://www.trendingbuffalo.com/life/uncle-steves-buffalo/ev...</a><p>* <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45161816">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45161816</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:56:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47867744</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47867744</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47867744</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "Youth Suicides Declined After Creation of National Hotline"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>It's also important to remember that any blocker between a potential suicide victim and the weapon of choice reduces rates greatly. A gun locked in a safe where the potential suicide knows the code - reduces rates.</i><p>RAND found that minimum age requirements and child-access prevention laws reduced suicides and unintentional injuries/deaths and violent crime:<p>* <a href="https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/child-access-prevention.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/child-acce...</a><p>* <a href="https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/minimum-age.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/minimum-ag...</a><p>* <a href="https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy.html</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:53:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47867709</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47867709</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47867709</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "Startups Brag They Spend More Money on AI Than Human Employees"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Cloud computing versus on-prem is often about OpEx versus CapEx.<p>Is the reported behaviour an example of OpEx/CapEx but with humans?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 17:22:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47866506</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47866506</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47866506</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "Another Day Has Come"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>Until now Apple hasn't addressed the mass market in nearly two decades.</i><p>Going back to 2008:<p>> <i>But the most fun on the conference call came when he parried analysts’ questions about new product areas that Apple might or might not enter. A recurring question among Apple watchers for decades has been, “When is Apple going to introduce a low-cost computer?</i><p>> <i>Mr. Jobs answered that decades-old complaint by stating, “We don’t know how to build a sub-$500 computer that is not a piece of junk.” He argued instead that the company’s mission was to add more value for customers at current price points.</i><p>* <a href="https://archive.nytimes.com/bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/21/read-my-lips/" rel="nofollow">https://archive.nytimes.com/bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/2...</a><p>USD(2008) 500 = USD(2026) 760:<p>* <a href="https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm" rel="nofollow">https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm</a><p>which is about what the Neo costs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 15:19:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47864882</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47864882</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47864882</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "3.4M Solar Panels"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>In my native Netherlands I'd guess to see that peaking at ~south at say 15-30 degrees, with some lower peaks at east/west combos.</i><p>Folks are doing some interesting exploration of the pros and cons of different alignments, e.g.:<p>> <i>When roof area is limited, the question becomes: What layout lets you install the most space-efficient solar capacity within budget on the available area? In those scenarios, an east–west (E–W) layout can outperform a south-facing layout. The South layout may be “better positioned”, but the E-W allows the installation of more panels in the same area.</i><p>* <a href="https://ases.org/east-west-vs-south-facing-solar-when-more-panels-beats-perfect-direction/" rel="nofollow">https://ases.org/east-west-vs-south-facing-solar-when-more-p...</a><p>Basically examining 'quality versus quantity', depending on what your location and roof allows.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 14:47:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47864429</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47864429</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47864429</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "All phones sold in the EU to have replaceable batteries from 2027"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>Parking spaces with restricted access... basically ideal for having every space with a charger.</i><p>Assuming that the landlord (or condo corp/HOA) is willing to pay for the infrastructure upgrades. Also assuming there is electrical capacity.<p>* <a href="https://www.metroev.ca/blog/ev-charger-load-management" rel="nofollow">https://www.metroev.ca/blog/ev-charger-load-management</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 16:16:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47850910</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47850910</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47850910</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "Tim Cook's Impeccable Timing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>It doesn't even have to be hardware. Maybe the guy from hardware who created and maintained excellence under his org can bring that level to where Apple has fallen - software.</i><p>There was already a change in software with Alan Dye's departure and Stephen Lemay taking over:<p>* <a href="https://www.macrumors.com/2025/12/04/john-gruber-on-alan-dye/" rel="nofollow">https://www.macrumors.com/2025/12/04/john-gruber-on-alan-dye...</a><p>AIUI, lots of folks internal to Apple were not happy with Dye, and are happy with Lemay. Some consider it a failing of the executive that Dye wasn't <i>pushed out</i> sooner (rather than choosing to jump himself).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:45:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47848755</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47848755</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47848755</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "Tim Cook's Impeccable Timing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>Yes they were able to uphold high standards and get preferential production and pricing but what else?</i><p>Ask Boeing, who outsourced a lot of stuff (for the 787, and other things) and had all sorts of problems. To the point they re-integrated a company they spun out in the first place to try to save money with:<p>* <a href="https://boeing.mediaroom.com/2025-12-08-Boeing-Completes-Acquisition-of-Spirit-AeroSystems" rel="nofollow">https://boeing.mediaroom.com/2025-12-08-Boeing-Completes-Acq...</a><p>* <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirit_AeroSystems" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirit_AeroSystems</a><p>Ask all the companies that outsourced IT and software development to (e.g.) India, <i>etc</i>.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:39:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47848671</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47848671</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47848671</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "All phones sold in the EU to have replaceable batteries from 2027"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>For most people most of the time charge while you sleep.</i><p>Unless you're a 'garage orphan': no garage, driveway or parking pad, and have to park on the street.<p>* <a href="https://electricautonomy.ca/news/2019-06-24/solving-the-electric-vehicle-garage-orphans-problem/" rel="nofollow">https://electricautonomy.ca/news/2019-06-24/solving-the-elec...</a><p>* <a href="https://www.theenergymix.com/garage-orphans-scramble-for-charging-while-multi-unit-buildings-lag-on-installations/" rel="nofollow">https://www.theenergymix.com/garage-orphans-scramble-for-cha...</a><p>Apartments (either rental, or condo ownership) may have underground parking with a few slots for charging.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:36:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47848635</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47848635</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47848635</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw0101d in "John Ternus to become Apple CEO"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>Why would anyone pay close attention to a company ?</i><p>Why would anyone pay close attention to a sports team? A musician? A writer?<p>But if you read Arment's post:<p>> <i>As you grow into the leader that we know you can be, I urge you, on behalf of everyone who loves computers as much as we do, to protect and cultivate this spirit of Apple’s founders as the company’s top priority:</i><p>> <i>*We love computers. We don’t hide that — we celebrate it!</i><p>> <i>*We use computers to enhance our minds, lives, and abilities — not to be controlled, restricted, tricked, placated, angered, or surveilled.</i><p>> <i>*Our computers work for us, with the utmost respect for our time, attention, money, data, and privacy.</i><p>> <i>*We are customers and owners — not resources to be harvested, annoyed, or badgered into ever more services and upsells.</i><p>> <i>Apple leads the industry in these values, but leading doesn’t always mean excelling. Remaining true to these values requires constant diligence, honest evaluation, introspection, and the audacity and courage to effect change.</i><p>* <a href="https://marco.org/2026/04/01/letter-to-john-ternus" rel="nofollow">https://marco.org/2026/04/01/letter-to-john-ternus</a><p>Perhaps if more companies had values besides "shareholder value"[1] the world would be a better place.<p>[1] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedman_doctrine" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedman_doctrine</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:23:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47848472</link><dc:creator>throw0101d</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47848472</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47848472</guid></item></channel></rss>