<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: throw310822</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=throw310822</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 09:29:17 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=throw310822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "The 100k Whys of AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> you're asking 1,000 different humans with different experiences and different skills and different moods<p>Simply, if you ask an LLM, you're asking always to the same mind, and always for the first time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 06:51:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616311</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616311</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616311</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "Can you see three trees?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>From one window? From all windows? And how far from the window they should be visible, and how far can you look? Can you stick your head out? Can we cheat by planting a few very tall trees that can be seen from very far away? :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 10:05:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48607975</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48607975</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48607975</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "Local Qwen isn't a worse Opus, it's a different tool"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I think most people do not need SOTA<p>SOTA can code but can also prove theorems and teach you about music theory or ancient Greece's substrate language or botany. Speaking in tens of different languages. I wonder how many hundreds of billions of parameters can be saved just by removing much of the general knowledge parts while keeping logical and programming abilities the exact same.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 07:06:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48581833</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48581833</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48581833</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "GPT‑NL: a sovereign language model for the Netherlands"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, but what's the point of a support bot that writes good Dutch when it can't follow instructions, doesn't understand the questions or can't solve problems? I might be wrong, but I don't think atm these models have the cognitive ability to perform any task in a satisfactory manner.<p>As for accessing pii, I imagine the value here is in the fact they're local, which has nothing to do with the "sovereignty" of these models. If anything, a model is more likely to be tricked by a malicious prompt the farther it is from the sota.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:12:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48567325</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48567325</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48567325</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "Leaked OpenAI financials show $38.5B loss and compute burn"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> OpenAI's spending mix shows why. The reported 2025 figures include $7.5 billion in cost of revenue, $19.18 billion in research and development, $5.73 billion in sales and marketing, and $1.57 billion in general and administrative expense<p>How the hell did they spend 5.7 billion in "sales and marketing"?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 03:26:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48565331</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48565331</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48565331</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "GPT‑NL: a sovereign language model for the Netherlands"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Can you provide some examples of these use cases?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 23:29:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48563723</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48563723</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48563723</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "GPT‑NL: a sovereign language model for the Netherlands"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't understand this. Even if that were true (and it isn't in my experience), a model that is trained on a Dutch corpus and arguably "knows Dutch well" but has the reasoning and comprehension abilities of a three year old is useless in any case. I'd rather use a model that can only speak English and put an automatic translator around it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 23:27:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48563706</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48563706</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48563706</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "SpaceX to buy Cursor for $60B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I didn't say it's used to buy things. I said it's bought and sold.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 18:25:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48559749</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48559749</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48559749</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "Apple's weird anti-nausea dots cured my car sickness"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Let me add: I wonder if that's the reason the sight of puke immediately makes me want to vomit too. If you're in a group of people you probably all ate the same stuff. Better to vomit as soon as the first start to feel sick than wait for your turn- it might be too late then.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 17:39:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48558934</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48558934</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48558934</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "SpaceX to buy Cursor for $60B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Cursor's edit data is invaluable to anyone who wants to train a coding model.<p>Ok. So what prevents a company from offering a Claude Code/ Cursor equivalent, with 100% subsidised Claude (= 100% free), capturing the exact same data that Cursor does? If the data is worth in the tens of billions, the cost of subsidising the usage is negligible.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 17:05:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48558406</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48558406</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48558406</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "SpaceX to buy Cursor for $60B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sure, if there were a stable enough market in which I can fetch twice that amount for that tulip, I'd buy it in a heartbeat. Wouldn't you?<p>The point being: BTC is a an abstract good, of no practical use except that of being transacted. Has whatever value the people are willing to pay for it, and has had a value in the tens of thousands for long enough that buying one with the intent of keeping it for a while is not such a stupid idea. I don't currently own any but there is a price at which I would buy one, and that price is many thousands of dollars... For an alphanumeric code in a distributed ledger.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 14:27:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48555867</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48555867</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48555867</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "SpaceX to buy Cursor for $60B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>BTC's use is being bought and sold. So it's not useless. If I offer you one BTC for $30k, will you buy it?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 13:39:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48555156</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48555156</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48555156</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "SpaceX Is Buying Cursor"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As long as there is someone around who is very good at keeping the price inflated (and that in turn also because he did actually deliver extraordinary things, it's not just smoke and mirrors).<p>On the other hand, the fact that BTC has absolutely no intrinsic value can be an advantage over a real company, as it makes it more insulated from reality. Supply chain  shock? No problem. Competition? Same. New technologies, political change? Neither.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 13:37:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48555137</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48555137</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48555137</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "Report on an Unidentified Space Station – J.G. Ballard (1982)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, they have instruments and they ignore their readings when they appear to diverge wildly from their assumptions. (Here the mention of gravity is confusing because that's one thing you don't need an instrument to measure and that directly translates to mass- but I interpret the sentence you quoted as meaning: "our instruments read a powerful gravitational field that doesn't match with the mass reasonable for a 500 metres station, so it's probably a faulty reading").<p>In any case, the following report clarifies:<p>"To our surprise we find that the station is far larger <i>than we guessed</i>. [...] This fine vapour obscured the substantial bulk of the station <i>and led us to assume that it was no more than a few hundred metres in diameter</i>."<p>So the reporter refers to his previous estimate as <i>a guess</i>, not a measurement, and specifies that the assumption was based on what they could <i>see</i>. The following estimates are similarly guesses based on their current understanding and explorations, not the output of some specific instrument.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 08:23:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48538221</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48538221</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48538221</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "Report on an Unidentified Space Station – J.G. Ballard (1982)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The size estimates provided are not instrumental readings- there's no information in the text that supports this interpretation. They are- as it makes sense and as clearly stated- <i>estimates</i> based on the best knowledge and understanding of the reporter at that particular moment. They change with the physical exploration of the base. So when the reporter says  that the base is the size of the cosmos, his size estimate should match the size of the cosmos. It's pretty clear that here Ballard just chose a number that seemed both immense and a big enough jump from the previous estimate, but at a second look makes his character incoherent because he's contradicting what he just wrote.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 13:38:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48527107</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48527107</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48527107</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "GLM 5.2 Is Out"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oh, you think? The US have a habit of imposing sanctions on companies that don't respect their prohibitions- so for example they decided that companies cannot offer services to a certain EU citizen <i>in the EU</i> otherwise they'll be in a sea of troubles. In theory, imposing these so called "secondary sanctions" is against international law; in practice, the EU is so spineless that doesn't even dare to protest.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 11:47:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48526345</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48526345</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48526345</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "Israeli firm BlackCore suspected of meddling in New York and Scotland votes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, it describes ethnic cleansing. As for colonialism it doesn't need to be described, moving en masse to a country inhabited by an indigenous population to settle it is the definition of colonialism.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 23:35:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48522551</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48522551</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48522551</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "Israeli firm BlackCore suspected of meddling in New York and Scotland votes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Lol. While of course Zionism was conceived also as a solution to the persecutions that Jews were facing in Europe, it was born within the European ideology of nationalist movements of that period (which gave birth to several of the European nations of today) and of colonialism- also a widespread and uncontroversial feature of the time. Nothing specifically bad about Zionism in this respect, it's simply a product of the ideas of its time.<p>All the rest, about Israel existence today, is irrelevant. We can recognize the mistakes of the past to at least understand how we got to this point and what's the best and correct way forward. It's not about reverting history but at least knowing it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 22:18:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48522058</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48522058</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48522058</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "Israeli firm BlackCore suspected of meddling in New York and Scotland votes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Jewish and Jewish Israeli people are raised to be afraid of the entire world [...] This is due to a 1,000 year history of exactly that<p>Actually it goes way further. It seems that a large part of Jewish religion and culture is centered on  the idea of being persecuted. A quick list goes from the Egyptian slavery, to the attack by the Amalekites, to the Babylonian destruction of the First Temple, to Haman's plot to exterminate Jews in Persia... and we're still at the book of Esther, 5th century BCE. The list goes on and on. Each of these is commemorated in a religious or civil ceremony: Passover, Purim, Hanukkah, etc.<p>This is to say, Judaism is built around grievance. And grievance in turn, if kept unchecked, is dangerous because it can justify unethical behaviours that are seen as reparatory.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 22:04:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48521939</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48521939</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48521939</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throw310822 in "Israeli firm BlackCore suspected of meddling in New York and Scotland votes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You don't know your history. Zionism started in the late 19th century as a nationalist and colonialist movement; by 1917 it had already secured the support of the (soon to be) British administration of Palestine for the creation of a Jewish state there; mass immigration was already underway and flooded with hundreds of thousands of colonists a territory that had had almost no Jewish presence for a thousand years or more. Ethnic cleansing of the native population was already in the plans, as shown by the private diaries of the father of Zionism Theodore Herzl.<p>When in 1948 the UN formulated its partition plan (i.e. the proposal to expropriate the Palestinians of half of their land to give it to the Jewish immigrants), the land that the proposal assigned to the Jewish state had a 45% Palestinian population, which the newborn state immediately proceeded to ethnically cleanse. Besides, Israel never formally accepted the borders of the partition plan and immediately set to conquer new territory (plan Dalet).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:57:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48518488</link><dc:creator>throw310822</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48518488</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48518488</guid></item></channel></rss>