<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: throwaway587468</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=throwaway587468</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 05:21:10 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=throwaway587468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by throwaway587468 in "Dijkstra On the foolishness of "natural language programming""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The problem you’re referring to arose precisely due to lack of formalism. It was a problem back when mathematicians were toying with naive set theory, one not based on axioms, but instead on intuitive terminology. Moving to axiomatic, more formal, set theory solved it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 15:35:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43571252</link><dc:creator>throwaway587468</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43571252</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43571252</guid></item></channel></rss>