[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Israel%E2%80%93Lebanon_ce...

I skimmed Wikipedia [1] but couldn't find any mention of laws in Ukraine that forbid reporting from certain areas. I see laws forbidding statements of support for Russia, and laws enabling censorship. Maybe I've misunderstood: are you referring to anti-trespassing laws in general, and not specifically about reporters?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press_in_Ukrain...

> The Feb. 28 attack occurred the same day as a U.S. Tomahawk cruise missile struck a school in the city of Minab, several hundred miles away, killing 175 people. In the case of Lamerd, though, it involved a weapon that had been untested in combat.

> Why can't you just celebrate this good thing?

reads like /s .

> What really interests Cian, who has published research[1] exploring how audiences tend to have less trust in media outlets that are transparent about their AI use, is the fact that the Post disclosed its use of algorithmic pricing at all. “If you ask people [whether they] want transparency on what’s behind your pricing strategy, people say ‘yes,'” he says. “But what we found in my research is a paradox, in the sense that people think that they want to know, but once they know, the reaction is worse than not knowing.”

> [1] https://ideas.darden.virginia.edu/AI-disclosure-dilemma

Thank you sincerely for your sacrifice, Dan. Whenever I have an urge to flame, I picture my impending comment as one more grain of sand speeding towards your cranium, and instead I step away from the keyboard.

Thanks for making a stink about it.

(edit: I now see you used the p-word to describe it too, and normally I'd edit my post to use a different synonym, but "pablum" really is the perfect description. I also assume you already reported this account to hn@ so I won't bug the mods a second time.)

No, and I'm sorry for derailing your point. Thank you for the additional links. I skimmed them all but didn't see anyone corroborate the claim that TSMC is limited by its upstream component suppliers, rather than its own factory underinvestment in prior years. Am I misunderstanding, and those two things are the same?

I'm not saying you should never listen to a word he says. His actions shape the world after all, so it's important to understand how his words precede his behavior. But I'm baffled why anyone would take Elon at his word, or even slightly hedge their perception of reality based on Elon's claims of fact.

That is not Donald Trump's / Stephen Miller's objective in Minnesota, nor is it the outcome.

See also his brief hesitation only when his farming and hospitality CEO buddies ask him to leave some illegals for their business needs.

Their old lane speeds up because many cars departed it

Everyone merges back to their old lane

You're back where you started.

I do appreciate Vinod Khosla's strongly worded tweet [1] linked from the article. (But I'm still gonna write an insult to him in the sand every time I visit Martins Beach.)

[1] https://x.com/vkhosla/status/2015647215642186008

Whether or not her car made contact with her killer, no reasonable person would assume she had any desire to run him over. There's also no reason for anyone to believe that shooting her as she drove past prevented an imminent mass casualty attack.

So then your argument boils down to: if you brush against law enforcement with your car, even by accident, they should kill you on the spot in retaliation.