[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolby_noise-reduction_system

These browsers are cool but I didn't know about browsh [1]. That one is also really cool. Thanks!

[1]: https://www.brow.sh/

Yes, and even when it learns (because there's new version of the AI model) it doesn't learn according to your company/team's values. Those values might be very specific to your business model.

Currently, AI (LLM) is just a tool. It's a novel and apparently powerful tool. But it's still just a tool.

If you live in a suitable city, there is an even simpler solution. Just walk to wherever place you need to go.

Unfortunately, the century of individual automobile ownership has made most cities unsuitable for this natural mode of transportation.

Besides, who is going to decide when people's images are sexualized enough? Are images of Elon Musk in bikini alright because he's not a woman or a child?

Worse. The AI doesn't share any responsibility.

If you have enough storage space on your iPhone, you can select "Download and Keep Originals" in the photo app settings.

Update: I noticed that the author mentions that "APL's famous terseness isn't a plus for LLMs." Isn't that just a design limitation of the LLM tokenizers?

[1]: https://github.com/ETHproductions/japt

[2]: https://github.com/isaacg1/pyth

[3]: https://github.com/DennisMitchell/jellylanguage

Honestly, Apple should officially maintain tools like this. However, for obvious reasons, such as the iCloud subscription revenue model, Apple will not do it. In fact, Apple may even make life harder for such tools.

I'm not sure about Linux, but my workflow on Windows and MacOS is to frequently back up my iPhone locally (which you should do anyway because few incorrect PINs can security lock your phone [1]) and use utility like backup extractor (e.g. [2] but there are many others) to extract all photos from the backup. This effectively removes the need to use iCloud.

[1]: https://support.apple.com/en-us/105090?device-type=iphone

[2]: https://github.com/joz-k/ios_backup_extractor

There a nice Mozilla Manifesto explaining the Mozilla mission and their values [1].

Apparently, it's difficult to find a stable, independent, and effective revenue model for an open-source browser that is completely free as a product, should not contain shady ads or product promotions, does not sell user data, and always puts the user first.

This is especially difficult because there are other free browsers with a similar mission that don't need to incur the cost of developing their own web engine.

[1]: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/manifesto/

For many people and purposes, it does indeed serve the same purpose. I use it all the time for coding, which is still very tricky, and for writing emails. For writing emails in particular, it is already a life-changing technology. I have always wanted my own secretary to dictate and finalize various letters. But, for some reason, companies don't provide secretaries anymore. Now, I can finally have an LLM instead. I guess there's no discussion that a good secretary must have always been quite intelligent.

You have my sympathy. I was also a frequent MS Publisher user, and I always felt that not many people knew about it. It's a useful, simple DTP package suitable for many less complex page layout scenarios. After the End-of-Support announcement, I switched to the LibreOffice Draw already. Fortunately, LibreOffice Draw works quite nicely as a Publisher replacement for me. There is also Scribus [1].

[1]: https://www.scribus.net/

Exactly. We need DAT Walkman back [1] [2].

[1]: https://www.dcaudiovisuel.com/product_info.php/products_id/1...

[2]: https://www.just-cassette.com/post/digital-audio-cassette-da...

[1]: https://www.pentagram.com/news/caligra-computers-for-experts

[2]: https://www.instagram.com/p/DPEvytujE4k/

[3]: https://www.instagram.com/p/DPEvytujE4k/?img_index=8

So, what was the "satellite feed" mentioned in the story? Was it a regular TV broadcast, or something more internal distributed by NASA?