<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: tifik</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=tifik</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 01:26:41 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=tifik" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "ZuckOff Know when a camera is in the room"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Technical and legal norms are implementation of social norms. “obviously everybody knows that you are supposed to do it that way” doesnt hold up well at court, or during an argument about any decision that costs big bucks.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 11:25:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49785822</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49785822</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49785822</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "US Revokes Limits on Power Plants' Climate Pollution"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think it will be downvoted for being unnecessarily inflamatory.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 18:59:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49778841</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49778841</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49778841</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "The best relationships are all-encompassing."]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Replying to myself in case my point isnt clear - Im postulating that monogamy being some sort of “default” is inevitable, given enough time to evolve, regardless of how you setup the starting parameters.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 16:05:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436141</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436141</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436141</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "The best relationships are all-encompassing."]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>All good points, but this doesnt really answer my question. If we imagine this hypothetical non-monogamous society, with no social constructs incentivizing monogamy, jealousy being in human nature would remain a driver towards monogamy. I imagine historically this is how most religions arrived at propagating monogamy. In christianity and judaism for both genders, or in islam for female monogamy, as jealousy was such a common driver of conflict that may even escalate into wars. Enforcing monogamy as the moral choice has some merit, if it avoids bloodshed, though obviously ideally people capable of being in non-monogamous relationships shouldnt be punished for being in one.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 15:59:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436084</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436084</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436084</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "The best relationships are all-encompassing."]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>These are good insights, but I meant how do you adress it within the concept of a non monogamous society.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 15:50:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436000</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436000</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436000</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "The best relationships are all-encompassing."]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How do you address jealousy? Im very much on board with the idea in general, and have given it quite a bit of thought, but I’ve never been fully sold on the idea that jealousy is fully based on social constructs</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 15:24:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48435735</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48435735</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48435735</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "Age verification for social media, the beginning of the end for a free internet?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And that is where details matter. You can implement age verification in such a way that no data gets transmitted anywhere. Ofc I wouldn't expect Meta to not take a chance of collecting even more user data and blame a law for doing it, but if the law is written well enough, it won't mandate a specific method. If it does, definitely oppose it imo.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 23:22:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377593</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377593</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377593</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "Age verification for social media, the beginning of the end for a free internet?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>All of the kids will get a fake account and a VPN? Putting barriers in place will likely have some effect in the intended direction.<p>> This assumes that it will actually solve the problem anyway<p>I wouldn't expect any policy to _solve_ a problem in such a way that the problem completely disappears from the world, much like theft being illegal doesn't eliminate theft, but it sure distinctiveness it for a lot of people.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 23:18:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377564</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377564</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377564</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "Age verification for social media, the beginning of the end for a free internet?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The problem isn't an individual kids phone. It's their peers devices, or other ways they can explore the internet that isn't under their guardians control. This is a systemic issue that requires systemic approach. I am not making any claims about the qualities of currently discussed systemic solutions, but I do want to point out that the 'parents can just' argument is missing the mark.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 22:08:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377003</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377003</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48377003</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "Bitcoin trader recovers wallet with help of Claude"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I assumed 'this' refers to the title. That may have been incorrect.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 18:36:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139347</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139347</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139347</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "Bitcoin trader recovers wallet with help of Claude"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't have the data but I don't think most people look past the title.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 18:11:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139037</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139037</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139037</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "Gemini 3 Deep Think"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The idea is that each subagent is focused on a specific part of the problem and can use its entire context window for a more focused subtask than the overall one. So ideally the results arent conflicting, they are complimentary. And you just have a system that merges them.. likely another agent.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 19:19:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46993646</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46993646</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46993646</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "The healthcare market is taxing reproduction out of existence"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, and? Without it, the total paid would be at least the same or more.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 22:26:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46114192</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46114192</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46114192</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "Don't Download Apps"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was wondering if it's just me. I am using Brave on iOS with all the possible blockers enabled, so I'm not surprised when some website doesn't work well. Instagram literally freezes solid after 5-15s of being on the website, so I usually only quickly scan the top 2-3 posts in the feed. I only follow people I know personally, so this is usually enough to do once or twice a day and stay up to date. If I see a close friend posted a story I kinda want to see then it usually takes two or three hard closes of the browser to actually see it. Sucks, but sucks less than  being mental gamed into doomscrolling every time I get an app notification.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 22:15:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46062976</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46062976</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46062976</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "Claude Opus 4.5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I like that for this brief moment we actually have a competitive market working in favor of consumers. I ditched my Claude subscription in favor of Gemini just last week. It won't be great when we enter the cartel equilibrium.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 21:25:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46039535</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46039535</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46039535</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "New lab-grown human embryo model produces blood cells"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I know these are scientists and a 'Human embryo model' is a perfectly valid name, because it's a model of a human embryo, but it's a disaster from a marketing perspective. People will see 'human embryo' and it doesn't matter that it's just a model of one. You are now growing fetus-slaves.<p>Please call it something else.<p>Edit: they are calling it 'hematoids' and make it clear that it is quite different from an embryo. I'm not sure why it's compared to them in the first place then.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 19:33:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45583845</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45583845</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45583845</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "Discord says 70k users may have had their government IDs leaked in breach"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't know if I just became cynical and jaded, but is this really surprising to anyone in any way? Any time I give out my personal information to anyone for any reason, I basically treat it as 'any member of public can now access it'.<p>Even if a service doesn't have it in their TOS that they sell it to 3rd parties, they might do it anyway, or there will, sooner or later, be a breach of their poorly secured system.<p>To make it clear - I don't particularly blame any one corporation, this is a systemic issue of governments not having/not enforcing serious security measures. I just completely dropped the expectation of my information being private, and for the very few bits that I do actually want to stay private, I just don't, or allow anyone to, digitalize or reproduce them at all in any way.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 01:13:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45522379</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45522379</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45522379</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "Kirigami-inspired parachute falls on target"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was reseaching kirigami yesterday for a DYI project, and it was the first time I heard about kirigami, and of course I stumbled upon the parachute application. And now its on the front page of HN?<p>To whoever is running the simulation: This is a bit on the nose. And don't even try to Baader-Meinhof me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 06:34:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45499987</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45499987</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45499987</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "Two Amazon delivery drones crash into crane in commercial area of Tolleson, AZ"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If this were true, aviation cable markers would not be a thing. Also: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998_Cavalese_cable_car_crash" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998_Cavalese_cable_car_crash</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2025 19:05:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45453961</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45453961</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45453961</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tifik in "My five-year experiment with UTC"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> In my head, these are equivalent, like two labels for the same moment. There’s no mental conversion, no extra cognitive load.<p>Well said. Ill use this when explaining to my north american friends how 17:00 is 5pm in my head without doing any math.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 17:54:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44145876</link><dc:creator>tifik</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44145876</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44145876</guid></item></channel></rss>