Hacker News: tjosepo

New comment by tjosepo in "Merging Remix and React Router"

tjosepo — Fri, 17 May 2024 10:42:27 +0000

> it feels like a bait and switch to turn a client side library into a server side framework

And I think that's exactly what the React ecosystem needs right now.

There has been a growing split between client-side React and server-side React, with most existing React applications being client-side with no easy path to server-side that didn't involve a full app rewrite in Next.js or Remix.

The new React Router Vite plugin is that easy path to server-side React that people were looking for. If you're using React Router (like most client-side applications do), you're already 90% of the way there.

New comment by tjosepo in "Merging Remix and React Router"

tjosepo — Fri, 17 May 2024 10:27:56 +0000

Ryan did mention this in his talk at React Conf.

Shopify has had issues adopting Remix because their existing front-end codebases are massive and they couldn't afford to rewrite them to use Remix.

That's actually the whole motivation behind turning Remix into a bundler plugin. With a bundler plugin, you can incrementally migrate parts of your existing application to use the features of Remix without having to rewrite all of it.

New comment by tjosepo in "Netlify just sent me a $104k bill for a simple static site"

tjosepo — Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:02:30 +0000

It should not be visible, but security-by-obscurity is not something that makes me sleep well at night.

It's a design limitation of Netlify that might cost you $100,000 some day.

New comment by tjosepo in "Netlify just sent me a $104k bill for a simple static site"

tjosepo — Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:16:39 +0000

Every Netlify project is assigned a Netlify subdomain (i.e. `example.netlify.app`) that cannot be removed or proxied.

If anyone figures out what your Netlify subdomain is, it's my understanding that they can DDoS you and there's nothing you can do about it.

New comment by tjosepo in "JavaScript Bloat in 2024"

tjosepo — Fri, 23 Feb 2024 04:59:48 +0000

You can see from the recording that it's downloading the same few files from Codesandbox over and over again, as the iframes used for the examples are being unloaded and reloaded on scrolls and because the author disabled caching.

The author could've scrolled forever and the number would've gone up indefinitely.