But that's also a physics thing. Plain same-frequency boosters hamper frequency reuse on neighbor cells, so less bandwidth for you. And if boosters run on a separate band, you'd need to do frequency planning for them just like it's done for cells now.

Wireless is finicky, we should really avoid using it everywhere wired can be used instead.

If you want to jump on the bandwagon just build a semi fab. Lots of clean water, lots of electricity, lots of geologically stable ground, lots of money that can't be invested locally - can't see why that haven't been done already. And it will still be useful after the fad is over.

Visualization failed:

createProgram@https://magik.net/llmcity/:1098:115

MatrixRenderer@https://magik.net/llmcity/:1107:20

main@https://magik.net/llmcity/:1895:20

(IceCat)

I'd argue that how they should have been, but the reality is quite the opposite. The patent framework is all about novel ideas rather than costly research, even though ideas aren't any valuable anymore - the easy stuff that is cheap to reproduce once the idea is known is already discovered.

Multimedia codecs and similar stuff are pretty patent-worthy (costly research) but their value is an exponential function of their adoption, and hence the unencumbered one always wins. Same with basically everything else.

- In general, you are exposing too much of the internal object model to the user. E. g. nodes added by the user and nodes added during reconciliation might be same class internally, but the user don't care much about the latter.

- "Reconciliation" looks like a sure way to confuse everyone (e. g. made an equilateral triangle, why are my joints not exactly the same? Forgot to reconcile one).

- A button for automatically merging all attachments at a node into a joint would be nice (but that might require keeping a track on what got reconciled where).

- Would be nice to automatically adjust length ratio and reconciled offset for shallow connection angles.

- You have to tweak visibility settings to be able to select nodes, virtual links and attachments, that's a bit ugly. Would be nice e. g. to be able to select a virtual link behind currently selected physical link, or a node out of a list of nodes on the current link. Especially when adding a connection in the middle of a link - you have to select the link, then hide physical links. Perhaps only allow selecting valid/semantically meaningful elements in this modes, and highlight them so that they aren't occluded?

- Any way to exploit symmetry? That's a bit advanced, but if we are making a regular tetrahedron it's quite a chore to repeat every operation four times every time you have to readjust it. That's particularly desirable because when you one physically manufacturing the design, one'd like to know which parts are interchangeable.

- Make automatically assigned names shorter (i. e. J1 instead of "Joint 1") so that you could put them as labels on prints.

Because a significant percentage of "developers using LLM" have no clue what they are doing?

- The girl had a really rare genetic disorder, traceable to a single-base mutation, that result in intellectual disability. Her case was quite mild, she was verbal and only had a learning disability, other cases are often far more severe.

- They went for using adeno-associated virus as vector to deliver a CRISPR payload. It caused kidney and liver damage (AFAIUK due to immune response, not the virus itself? So hard to predict from an animal model.) which turned out fatal.

- The family paid a significant share of the research funding and some off-record financial favors to the research team.

- The research team's recent publication in Nature didn't mention the case at all (they basically chose keep silent about failures).

The whole story has quite some Flowers for Algernon vibes except real life is way more cynical and sad. And I disliked the book back when I read it because it felt like a weepie just for the sake of weeping.

I don't think there is a society in the world that ever had that successfully executed in practice. I live in Norway, and even if the public heath system is probably as good as it gets here, I often use private providers for non-urgent things simply because waiting time can be up to six month otherwise.

And even if you somehow manage this on paper, you'll be very surprised on how markets work. They don't need legal recognition. They don't even need money. See: USSR. Health care was public and medics weren't even a particularly attractive profession because there were too much of them already. Still if you wanted to survive an appointment you'd better have a package of some deficit wares ready.

What denies public healthcare money isn't "wealthy trying to cut public spending down". It's bureaucrats wanting their share of the pork barrel.

Yea, except datacenters also need connectivity. And submarine connectivity, while not particularly expensive, is quite vulnerable - even more so than on land.