My uid was < 32768.

Yes.

Then an AI duplicating style isn't inherently violating any rights either.

If you want to get them in the consumption of the content it gets murky quick. Have you every watched a pirated movie? Should you be convicted of that, or of sharing it?

Subsequently describing the movie to some else constitute sharing of it?

The days of:

10 PRINT "Hello World!"; 20 GOTO 10

Are long gone.

Miss those days. When I got a 386 and could use the turbo debugger to hack games. Pretty sweet. Just run the code; interrupt it near where it was asking for a word or number or clicking a symbol, then tweak a flag and let the game continue.

So often the final fix was to nop out an instruction that set a flag and just let it fall through.

Then there was the DSI team in Vancouver who encrypted their boot code...

Imagine that, using "think of the kids" as the scape goat to "totalitarian rule" seems to be the in thing these days.

So, meaningless at this time.

In an afternoon I was able to get it working and running reliably. I'm not saying there aren't potential issues, either in my code, lwip (supported framework).

What I am saying is that ipv6 with ipv6 multicast instead of Broadcasting is approachable today. It's approachable on the desktop as well as microcontrollers for IoT uses.

Seriously, this was so easy to get working I'm thinking of expanding the usage of some IoT projects I've been languishing on.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49880860

Points: 2

# Comments: 1

I named my social media folder anti-social for a reason.

Social media apps will always build to dark patterns; they are driven on engagement.

You have a statement to make and the your choice is making it's own statement about usability that is, frankly, off putting.

They aren't necessarily a sign of bias in the underlying model however. Many samples would be required for that.

If success was the intent, then it's a win.

While challenges are fun, sometimes the requirement is simply to achieve the end goal, with no other point than that.

If your job is to stop terrorists, and that includes hacking into a system and extracting their plans, the "fun" of it isn't the point, only the end goal it's important. Sometimes when we do things like this for fun we forget that someone else out there absolutely needs to achieve the result and doesn't care how it's achieved.

It's the part of penetration testing some people miss. (It's not generally a fun job, almost everyone I know that did it got out as soon as possible. They weren't solving problems, they just running audit scripts and generating reports.)

Problem solved. New problem created.

New problem?

Justifying the use of AI to do something these people act like would magically get done if you were just slightly more patient. Or, if you put in 60+ hrs of time.

Recognizing this is the first step.