But IMHO DEI answers the wrong question.

Worthwhile lives does not come from equal access to the hamster wheel.

I am much more pro UBI structures og negative taxation - which are inherently difficult to make descriminatory as there is no personal judgement of the people to receive it.

This is like me saying that it is more productive to work using pen and paper because it is not prone to electric failures in thunderstorms.

It is right under a certain low probability event that I myself can define and you cannot refute it.

It is because you guys are entirely logged into a very small subset of systems.

You are apparently also not able to separate the different concerns of authentication and identification.

You could easily envision a system where you can ID without any auth.

You being narrow minded is not me gaslighting.

So naturally, doctors should be much more welcoming to these types of inventions.

It is likely also a blind angle for mathematicians. Inherently they know exactly what goes on to whatever granularity they please. One of the benefits with not having to consider the real world.

You can easily have you own configuration without logging in.

So you are still making a trade-off

Not is it probable that people will take over our system. But is it possible.

The premise was not to enhance security, but to design a world where security and productivity are not tradeoffs.

For a start, most people would certainly be more productive if they hadn't had to authenticate themselves.

If you can just create a world for that simple case, then I will rest my case.

My own prediction is the opposite. I believe that a lot more humans will have a much deeper understanding of math, as you have llms to teach us.

However, this will only unlock if we get a hold of our own attention.

Though it is kind of wasted. Dihydrogen monoxide would be the chemical compound without any salts, minerals or other additives we normally get from water.

It would likely not be beneficial for you to drink it as opposed to water.

You just ask the business to advertise a single price.

Naturally businesses pass on the cost of doing business, it is literally their job.

Pricing just needs to be transparent - this is a key requirement for an efficient market. And something the US is failing at miserably.

An optional extra payment is worth more when interest rates are higher.

Ie. An optional extra payment of 1000$ will pay your 150$ a year in saved interest when the rate is 15% and only 15$ when the rate is 1.5%.

Everything else being equal, optional payments has a higher value, which represent value to the buyer.