I understand what you're getting at, but I think you greatly underestimate the amount of incorrect assertions that need to happen before a sensible consensus is reached. Historically, in the body of science, we're wrong something like 99% of the time until someone gets it right.

Also, your comment is a straw man argument. The law isn't going to chastise people questioning existing mainstream views, only the ones spouting horribly incorrect information. Noone is saying it will do that, other than you and other commenters who didnt read the article.

Last, are you really questioning the benefit of washing our hands?

Leave the thinking for the ones good at it, ok? You seem to be getting a little worked up and we wouldn't want to get your panties all twisted up trying and failing to overthrow democracy again.

Don't smoke it, use eddibles.

If you feel an electric shock from touching the MacBook while plugged in, there's a fault in your electric system. You need to have a professional electrician come out and look at it, immediately. Delaying or not doing so is waiting for a disaster to happen. You may now be liable too, because you know there's a problem and didn't fix it.

Why? No idea, but get your shit fixed before someone gets hurt.

Lots of people never stop learning until they die. It's just not as easy. Some people do better than others.

30 is not that age.

You ever consider you may be burnt out?

Bitcoin just consumes extra energy, not makes an existing process more efficient.

Don't get me wrong, it has medicinal uses and I support the legalization of it, but people like you calling it a miracle cure for everything are insufferable.