nope. it’s literally called the “food insecurity and obesity paradox” and it’s observed in high-income countries [0][1][2][3]

maybe if you had ~just~ done some research you’d be better equipped to more empathetically consider other’s perspectives and experiences

[0] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5394740/ [1] https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3... [2] https://www.jandonline.org/article/s0002-8223(07)01616-1/ful... [3] https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rstb/article/378/1888/202...

sure! depends on the exact poll but 50% of americans have reported issues with being able to afford groceries. 1/8th of households have actual food insecurity. whatever, that’s not even the main problem i have with your reply

> See how simple/doable those steps are?

i’ve already lost weight without GLP-1s using food tracking, etc. you don’t have to condescendingly prescribe lifestyle changes to me. it wasn’t simple and often did not feel doable, even though i am able to brush my teeth every day (?)

the objection i have is pretending these are simple, repeatable, or obvious pieces of advice that can slot in to any ‘ol lifestyle if you just care how you look or whatever

i’m also amused you couldn’t help yourself from saying “just” again

you are the reason for this policy change

it’s not perfect, i need to run more on the synology than is ideal for containerized reliability reasons, but it’s acceptable for personal stuff

it’s very funny to be actually doing the “oh you know the ones” tweet in 2026

ah man. you were doing so good. legitimate-sounding finance arguments, etc. why’d you have to slip that one in