1a. of, relating to, or characteristic of a profession

1c.1. characterized by or conforming to the technical or ethical standards of a profession

3. following a line of conduct as though it were a profession

No. Just the fact that they have a tool does not automatically make them a professional, doesn't automatically make them skillful, and doesn't automatically make their output worth something.

This is the meaning of "When they shoot a little artistic clip with their nice modern iPhone camera, it does not mean they get to insert it into a Hollywood movie."

There's nothing elitist about it.

Those professionals are professionals not because they own an iPhone and use it to shoot something.

Did you even read the article? Claude was opening he browser and iterating through the tabs.

I presume you are logged in to your github account? Your gmail?

> Whats it going to do? Email my coworkers nudes on my computer? Make my github profile public?

Reset access to services using your email? MITM your 2FA?

Or perhaps you have 1Password/Bitwarden running with a generous unlock policy?

You just wrote three paragraphs of text describing why it's unpredictable.

Moreover, for the same prompt on the same machine in a different session it will use a different set of tools.

Why would he? He was a) one of the most senior designers, b) directly responsible for its implementation and c) "driving force behind Liquid Glass" https://www.macrumors.com/2026/03/15/ios-27-macos-27-no-majo...

Why the hell do people keep assuming that whats-his-face was the one singular person responsible for Liquid Glass? How do they imagine Liquid Glass happened? By magic? Unbeknownst to any person in the company? Including the people who spent two hours on stage last year praising it?

They kinda do. For a long time HIGs were well researched documents with great examples and explanations.

For the past few years they've been used as post-hoc justifications (or just examples with no justifications) for whatever designs vomits out.

From a review at an attempt to butcher Safari interface several years back, by Riccardo Morri https://morrick.me/archives/9368

--- start quote ---

The utter user-interface butchery happening to Safari on the Mac is once again the work of people who put iOS first. People who by now think in iOS terms. People who view the venerable Mac OS user interface as an older person whose traits must be experimented upon, plastic surgery after plastic surgery, until this person looks younger. Unfortunately the effect is more like this person ends up looking… weird.

These people look at the Mac’s UI and (that’s the impression, at least) don’t really understand it. Its foundations come from a past that almost seems inscrutable to them. Usability cues and features are all wrinkles to them. iOS and iPadOS don’t have these strange wrinkles, they muse. We must hide them. We’ll make this spectacular facelift and we’ll hide them, one by one. Mac OS will look as young (and foolish, cough) as iOS!

--- end quote ---

(power users don't use mobile devices for their work, and yet...)

What's "safely quoted format" when prompt injection is already safe in the description?

> You can't inject the LLM if it doesn't see the data.

How doesn't it see the data when you literally say "The user asks for details of the last transaction, the user gets back the amount, the source, and the description"?

> And if you want the LLM to summarize things, you run an isolated instance that makes a summary

And it will make a summary exactly how?

How does it prevent DDOSing and/or exposing the database from an injected prompt?

Literally no one stopped to even question the insanity of this. "just add more AI"

It literally is:

EU: users must have choice.

Apple: no.

Apple literally says that because they are required to give users more choice they will give users less choice: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2025/09/the-digital-markets-a...

That's not really a choice. Hint: duopoly

> Also, in this case

You can't claim regulations to be onetous and bot onerous at the same time

Yes, they can. Apple wields its duopoly power to try and bend governments to its will.