As a legal geek, I feel the need to point out that you haven’t linked to any terms of service or similar documents (at least on the website). I only see a privacy policie imho looks very generall. Is that something you’ve thought about?

In the early stages you’re in, you’ll probably be fine, but you wouldn’t want to risk getting sued for something so simple down the line (like me hahah).

I’m the creator of a tool called Legalfast (legalfast.app), so I’d obviously recommend it. And hey… if the early adopter pricing feels too steep, let me know!

Wishing you all the best, // Sebbe

Are you planning to do something similar for iOS?

As a legal geek, I feel the need to point out that you haven’t linked to any privacy policies or similar documents (at least on the website). Is that something you’ve thought about?

In the early stages you’re in, you’ll probably be fine, but you wouldn’t want to risk getting sued for something so simple down the line.

I’m the creator of a tool called Legalfast (legalfast.app), so I’d obviously recommend it. And hey… if the early adopter pricing feels too steep, let me know!

Wishing you all the best, // Sebbe

I thought you meant on the website...

Still unprofessional.

I feel really silly for asking, but could you clarify which spelling mistake you're referring to? (I'm not denying there might be one.) Neither ChatGPT nor I could find one.

Regarding the language I chose, I completely understand your point, and it might be worth exploring other alternatives. However, I currently have 250 active visitors (who joined within the last 30 minutes), and it seems like the formulation might be going over their heads.

Initially, I was planning on releasing it without any text at all, with just one input.

I know it might sound a bit cheesy, but I believe it's uncensored enough to call it that. Try asking DALL·E to create an image of world politicians crashing planes into buildings (not sure why anyone would want that).

My decision to promote the uncensored nature of Flux was based on the fact that it's gaining traction on X and Reddit, where the user base often has specific political leanings.

Anything I should improve? :)

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41259573

Points: 5

# Comments: 9

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40694074

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

I am using Anthropic AI for this project, and I started this project partly because I wanted to try it out.

* For design, I give it screenshots of the website * For copywriting, I give it a markdown formatted version of the website * For SEO and accessibly I give it the HTML

I agree, I want to bring the price down as much as possible but ATM I'm losing money for every 18 people who generate a free report without anyone paying. If I get those numbers down, or my costs reduced, expect lower prices.

But for now, I'm going to stay on the safer side, write my policy, and hopefully avoid GDPR fines.

I had some people contacting me to let me know and I had it fixed immediately.

I really should test more thoroughly and also not copy and paste a new Regex for validation at the last second (oops).

I thought I was clever with my Lorem Ipsum, to protect it with the inspect tool.

Thanks for letting me know, but if someone goes out there way to open the network requests to see the report, they can just email me and as for a free report hahah.

Jokes aside, ill have it fixed, thank you :)

I get where you are coming from but here is how I'm justifying it:

Each report generated by a user costs me $0,03-$0,1 which adds up quickly, especially when having untargeted traffic (like HN).

If my product was based around a subscription, I could see myself offering the whole report thing for free as bait, but that's not the case (at the moment). The whole product is the report, and it's the only thing.

The “I’m going broke, time to pay” tactic sounds great and will be used, but unless I make some changes (any suggestions??) it's not suitable for now, I don't think.

I'm not going to defend myself regarding the "switch and bait", since the goal is 100% to get people to generate a report, and then show them just a little bit and give them FOMO-ish. The whole goal of how I designed the website is to answer the question "why not" rather than "why". However, if people feel like they have been tricked, and that they don't want to purchase the full report, just because of that, It's definitely something I need to change. ATM I feel like, you as a user don't lose much, other than 60-90 seconds of waiting (sorry), for an actual "free report", even though it's limited.

But I totally understand what you are saying, and I even agree to a certain degree.

As for the validation, I have fixed it and I think it works better now.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40108139

Points: 14

# Comments: 20