I heard something that helps better framing those discussions, use "familiar" instead of "simple".

An highly abstract way to access a database table, with ORM for example, can be simple because everyone is expecting it and knows how to do all tasks (changing schema, troubleshooting, managing transactions, etc.).

Doing userService.pgSql("select ....") in the same way can be simple.

By chance, recently in an architecture discussion document I added that one of aspects to consider is how easy is to remove (the whole thing) if it's not wanted anymore.

It was an obvious case because it was an AI capability, which can be become deprecated/useless/too-risky very fast.

The article is interesting but I think it deviates from a common developer experience as many don't work on Python libraries, which likely heavily follow patterns that the model itself already contains.

The usual trade-off of a well paid software development job is lack of job security and always learning - the skill set is always changing in contrast with other jobs.

My suggestion, stop chase trends and start to hear from mature software developers to get better perspective on what's best to invest on.

And why the mantra is always true?

You can find stable job (slow moving company) doing basic software development and just learn something new every 4 years and then change companies.

Or never change company and be the default expert, because everyone else is changing jobs, get job security, work less hours and have time within your job to uplift your skills.

Keep chasing latest high paid jobs/trends by sacrificing off time.

What's the best option for you? Only you know, it's depends on your own goals.

Here's a news link https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/01/23/use-of-eu-fund...

I don't have time/will to find more consolidating information but some EU-Elites regularly use NGOs to support their own policy goals, against member states governments and their populations. They always excuse themselves by saying they fund everyone... but one side of the issue usually gets more funds than the other.

If I recall correctly in one "EU wants to monitor the internet" regulations, EU directly funded targeted AD campaigns to convinced some Member state populations to support it so the government would change its intended vote. They were caught and backed off. Then they funded some NGO to do it :D

I really dislike that now I'm going to have two problems, managing other tools installed through a makefile, e.g. lint, and managing tools "installed" through go.mod, e.g. mocks generators, stringify, etc.

I feel like this is not a net negative on the ecosystem again. Each release Golang team adds thing to manage and makes it harder to interact with other codebases. In this case, each company will have to decide if they want to use "go tool" and when to use it. Each time I clone an open source repo I'm going to have to check how they manage their tools.

I think this is actually already in motion in board meetings, I'm pretty sure executives are discussing something like "if we spend Z$ on AI tools, can we avoid hiring how many engineers?"

I have tried cursor.ai, agent mode, and I see a clear big impact.

Most uncertainty in temperature does not come from measured temperature (weather stations) but from temperature estimations from indirect sources. In other words, last 50 years data is pretty much all good.

I would guess the 15$/hour value was chosen to approximate an average gross salary. The annualized payment would be 31200$[1] and it seems the average annual salary was around 30359$.

Updated to 2022 values the annual gross pay would be 10033€ [3], current average annual gross salary is 20483€ [4].

[1] 15$ * 2080 hours [2] https://www.repository.utl.pt/bitstream/10400.5/9819/1/ee-ja... [3] https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ipc&xlang=en [4] https://www.pordata.pt/pt/estatisticas/salarios-e-pensoes/sa...

Apple has a top notch logistics and security processes which had mitigated the issue of supply chain attack in China which his willing and capable of producing such attacks.

Moving some production to the USA might induce some sloppiness in this due a perceived inferior risk.

Also, some security measures requested by Apple to manufacturers in other countries are probably illegal in the USA.

The traditional anti-cheat can be just slapped after the game is developed in most games. If the game is very successful then you can just update the game with extra paid protections provided by the anti-cheat tool.

The alternative is local game engine that works with a partial game state which is a challenge on it self. If you still can make it work, you will still have to deal with people "modding" the client to gain an advantage. E.g.: enemies are painted red instead of camouflage.

Thanks :)

Yep, it's just pain :D I'm native portuguese speaker but I navigate the english web.

Hey siri, read notifications (portuguese name bad written) sent message .

or:

E aí siri, lê notificações (read notifications in portuguese) Notificação de Twitter,

Be aware that a good rationale for choosing the database but you should enforce a specific precision per table otherwise you can get nasty accounting bugs because you're adding a 3.0095 amount with an 9.99 amount.

This is just one of conditions, being "allowed" is very limited.