<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: twinwest</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=twinwest</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 12:16:46 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=twinwest" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by twinwest in "Learning Programming in an Age of LLMs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am curious that would there be any new programming language being invented in the age of LLMs, as LLM is about probability and need to trained on a large dataset to perform. It looks like the incentive is less while it costs more to create a new programming language.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 18:40:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49731174</link><dc:creator>twinwest</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49731174</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49731174</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by twinwest in "Small programming tricks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have the same feeling, there are new approaches and tricks to get things done, mainly from how to work with AI more efficiently. But the human brain still needs to be trained and learn new things to not get rotted</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 18:32:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49731067</link><dc:creator>twinwest</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49731067</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49731067</guid></item></channel></rss>