<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: typ</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=typ</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:47:50 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=typ" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "Mac mini will be made at a new facility in Houston"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>6% compared to the post-2000s is mediocre, especially given the low baseline. Not remarkably better than other high-income democratic countries like Japan and West Germany. Even the US can have ~4% growth at the time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 02:33:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47146561</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47146561</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47146561</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "Mac mini will be made at a new facility in Houston"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>American business leaders have (had?) an obsession with gross margin and tech "advancedness."  They thought they would be the winner as long as they occupied the high-tech sectors in the supply chain. So they discarded the high-volume, low-margin, low-growth, low-tech businesses like assembly lines and outsourced them. But the reality is that the proximity of the assembly lines creates a cost advantage that attracts more upstream suppliers to surround it. Even Intel was seeking to build more fabs in China before being stopped by the US government.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 02:05:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47146385</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47146385</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47146385</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "Mac mini will be made at a new facility in Houston"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If that were the true secret sauce of the economic success in China, why had it not taken off before the 2000s? Like, they have been that "aligned" and "want the same thing" and "run by engineers" since the 50s, no?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 01:46:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47146259</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47146259</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47146259</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "TSMC to make advanced AI semiconductors in Japan"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The silicon shield became a slogan that has only been popularized in recent years. The potential crisis of war has been there for more than half a century (even before semiconductors became a thing). The real value proposition of the status quo is the freedom of navigation between the northeastern Asian countries and the SEA (the Strait of Malacca, aka the lifeline of energy imports), and the consequential domino effect of the entire western Pacific.<p>Also, not sure why everyone forgets about it. People should have learned from the experience of the pandemic that the cutting-edge foundry nodes are not really the crucial ones, as being the bottleneck of industrial infrastructure. A delay of the next-gen iPhone or RTX gaming card isn't that catastrophic. But a shortage of embedded MCUs, which are actually fabricated by mature nodes, could stall the entire industrial base of a country.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 06:46:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46942292</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46942292</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46942292</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "We tasked Opus 4.6 using agent teams to build a C Compiler"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'd bet, on average, the quality of proprietary code is <i>worse</i> than open-source code. There have been decades of accumulated slop generated by human agents with wildly varied skill levels, all vibe-coded by ruthless, incompetent corporate bosses.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 01:50:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46908002</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46908002</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46908002</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "Data centers in space makes no sense"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> reduce energy requirement by 10-50 times<p>This is only relevant to the compute productivity (how much useful work it can produce), but it's irrelevant to the heat dissipation problem. The energy income is fundamentally limited by the solar facing area (x 1361 W/m^2). So the energy output cannot exceed it, regardless useful signals or just waste heat. Even if we just put a stone there, the equilibrium temperature wouldn't be any better or worse.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 07:58:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46882841</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46882841</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46882841</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "Data centers in space makes no sense"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That should be better than a sphere. Though I imagine there could be some fancier 3D geometry designs.<p>Even for a simple sphere, if we give it different surface roughnesses on the sun-facing side and the "night" side, it can have dramatically different emissivity.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 05:34:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46881863</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46881863</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46881863</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "Data centers in space makes no sense"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Assuming that we place an iron ball (ideal sphere-shaped and thermal conductivity) on the SSO (solar synchronous orbit), how hot can the object be?<p>Given the solar constant 1361 W/m^2, you can calculate the temperature range based on the emissivity and absorptivity. With the right shape and “color”, the equilibrium temperature can be cooler than most people thought.<p>I suppose that a space data center powered 100% by solar is no different than this iron ball in principle.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 01:25:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46880136</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46880136</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46880136</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "xAI joins SpaceX"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The radiator area is probably not what they need to worry about that much as we thought. When the energy input comes from solar 100%, they just need to optimize the ratio of the sectional area facing the sun over the total surface area of the satellite. If the ratio is low enough, like a fin or cone shaped object, it will be harder to be hot.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 23:14:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46878782</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46878782</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46878782</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "xAI joins SpaceX"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not sure about the effectiveness of a heat pump in this use case.<p>>Heat radiation works better the higher the temperature?<p>The power output is proportional to T^4 according to the Stefan-Boltzmann law.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 08:07:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46868009</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46868009</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46868009</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "xAI joins SpaceX"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It makes sense to target a higher operating temperature, like 375K. At some point, the energy budget would reach an equilibrium. The Earth constantly absorbs solar energy and also dissipates the heat only by radiative cooling. But the equilibrium temperature of the Earth is still kind of cool.<p>I guess the trick lies in the operating temperature and the geometry of the satellites.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 06:48:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46867417</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46867417</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46867417</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "Kimi Released Kimi K2.5, Open-Source Visual SOTA-Agentic Model"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The label 'open source' has become a reputation reaping and marketing vehicle rather than an informative term since the Hugging Face benchmark race started. With the weights only, we cannot actually audit that if a model is a) contaminated by benchmarks, b) built with deliberate biases, or c) trained on copyrighted/privacy data, let alone allowing other vendors to replicate the results. Anyways, people still love free stuff.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 08:45:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46777215</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46777215</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46777215</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "Loss32: Let's Build a Win32/Linux"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Rather than API/ABI stability, I think the problem is the lack of coherence and too many fragile dependencies. Like, why should a component as essential as Systemd have to depend on a non-essential service called d-bus? Which in turn depends on an XML parser lib named libexpat. Just d-bus and libexpat combined takes a few megabytes. Last time I checked, the entire NT kernel, and probably the Linux kernel image as well, has no more than single-digit MBs in size. And by the way, Systemd itself doesn’t use XML for configurations. It has an INI style configuration format.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 01:19:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46440241</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46440241</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46440241</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "DeepSeekMath-V2: Towards Self-Verifiable Mathematical Reasoning"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The difference is that you can customize/debug it or not. You might say that a .EXE can be modified too. But I don't think that's the conventional definition of open source.<p>I understand that these days, businesses and hobbyists just want to use free LLMs without paying subscriptions for economic motives, that is, either saving money or making money. They don't really care whether the <i>source</i> is truly available or not. They are just end users of a product, not open-source developers by any means.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 14:17:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46107713</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46107713</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46107713</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Replacing the Type Checker for the Swift Compiler]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://forums.swift.org/t/replacing-the-type-checker/79518">https://forums.swift.org/t/replacing-the-type-checker/79518</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45522850">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45522850</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 02:26:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://forums.swift.org/t/replacing-the-type-checker/79518</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45522850</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45522850</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "Be careful with Go struct embedding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It seems to come from a Plan 9 C idiom that GCC even has an extension for it.<p><a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/Unnamed-Fields.html" rel="nofollow">https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-5.3.0/gcc/Unnamed-Fields....</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 02:03:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45328425</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45328425</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45328425</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "Apple announces American Manufacturing Program"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Downstream assembly factories attract component manufacturers because of lower transport costs and shorter delivery times, which can lead to network effects. (Remember why Intel wanted to build more foundries in China a few years ago?)  That's the success formula of Shenzhen, for example.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 06:00:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44821104</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44821104</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44821104</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "argp: GNU-style command line argument parser for Go"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe the README should mention whether reflection (the part that would disable dead-code elimnation) is used? That was a pain point for me when I had to investigate a binary bloat issue due to reflect.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 01:54:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43457315</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43457315</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43457315</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "Supply constraints do not explain house price, quantity growth across US cities"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Homes are not a homogeneous commodity. New homes cannot be perfect substitutes due to locations, amenities, access to jobs (commute time), etc. Also, government spending on infrastructure will be capitalized into the neighborhood's land (location) value. You cannot 'undo' this capitalization simply by building more homes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 05:42:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43420149</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43420149</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43420149</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by typ in "A 10x Faster TypeScript"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>C# is fine. But last I checked, the AOT compilation generates a bunch of .dll files, which are not suitable for a CLI program like Go's zero dependencies binary.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:22:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43334081</link><dc:creator>typ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43334081</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43334081</guid></item></channel></rss>