<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: tyre</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=tyre</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 16:15:52 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=tyre" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "UUIDv7: Timestamps aren’t time-ordered and other oddities"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's because it's opaque. Signing up and seeing a page like `/companies/366` unnecessarily leaks company data. Sometime it's a huge deal, sometimes not; not here to litigate that. But it's trivially avoidable.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 20:26:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50214841</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50214841</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50214841</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "UUIDv7 doesn't have the properties you think it does"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Do you care about users knowing <i>when</i> another business was put into the system (e.g. how long they've been with you"? If yes, v4. If no, v7.<p>v4 is less efficient but more private.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 20:24:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50214823</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50214823</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50214823</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "UUIDv7: Timestamps aren’t time-ordered and other oddities"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So you have a second, opaque unique identifier for the frontend to fetch? At that point why not just use a single column (UUID)?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 20:22:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50214792</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50214792</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50214792</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "UUIDv7: Timestamps aren’t time-ordered and other oddities"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You don't have to handle collisions and I don't believe that multiple Redditors have experienced this. If they have, it's an issue with the implementation and not UUIDs.<p>The math is simply not in there favor, by a number so large we cannot conceive of it in our tiny brains.<p>UUIDs have other useful properties. For example, they don't expose counts (e.g. how many customers you have.) They make URL / resource guessing impossible.<p>ids in the form of `[prefix]_[uuid stripped of dashes]` is ideal for most use cases. It should be the default the way Postgres is the default. Any deviation have good reason.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 20:21:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50214775</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50214775</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50214775</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "PingCap TiDB Leaks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Let's say you have a remote client connect to a url to the database. You stream a download through there. You close the connection when you're finished.<p>No commands run.<p>No persistent access.<p>Lawyers are amazing.<p>Edit: Yes, based on the comment by dherls, this is how they're getting around it. Streaming replication is not commands run by the attackers (it's your own system doing the exfiltration!)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 21:08:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50201067</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50201067</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50201067</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "Voxtral 3"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not really. You can still put limits on the rate or aggregate dollar amount of refunds or transfers. You can put alerting on spikes of approvals. You can put back pressure that forces manual review. You can have ML models detecting aberrant behavior against historical data.<p>No one reasonable is saying, “hook up this model to do anything it wants with no other system available.”<p>Will people fuck it up? Absolutely! But, “the model has to be perfect or it will bankrupt a company” is more cynical than reality.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 21:18:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50172813</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50172813</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50172813</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "DeepSeek search and fetch – $0.75 per 1000 successful requests"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Search API finds web pages for a query and returns structured results. It is powered by DeepSeek's in-house search engine.<p>Looks like they've built (or are building) their own index and return cached results. What you do with that information is up to you. If you want to visit the live page, you'd need to find a way around bot detection.<p>One reason (not the only one!) people use Anubis is to prevent the endless flood of requests from AI companies. If Deepseek scrapes once every few hours, that helps the website owner with the traffic problem while allowing access.<p>If they don't want to allow access, my <i>guess</i> is that deepseek's search crawler respects robots.txt but I don't know.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 07:30:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50138791</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50138791</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50138791</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "Apple ML Research: Muse Spark Open with MLX on Mac Studio"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They’re not really. They make the things useful for two classes of users: Mac Studio for people running models locally and Siri backed by Gemini for voice interaction.<p>They’ll likely embed text models more deeply in the future, but the history of “Apple Intelligence” doesn’t give a lot of hope that they’ll nail it.<p>So they’re not selling shovels (a precursor to making the thing) but products and services to use it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 13:57:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50131239</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50131239</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50131239</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "Muse Spark Open"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think it was ousted by a fast food chicken app fwiw. Couldn’t tell you why.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 19:13:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50123071</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50123071</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50123071</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "Muse Spark Open"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Have they fully implemented the Gemini-backed Siri?<p>I will say that I asked Siri some questions recently that I was pretty sure it would fumble and it answered directly.<p>“Does brown go with charcoal in clothing?”, for example, didn’t fall back to “I’ve found some web results. I can send them to your iPhone”. It actually answered.<p>It still has random nonsense regularly, but the “ask a question, get an actual answer” is new to me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 19:12:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50123039</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50123039</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50123039</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "Show HN: How random are you?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's another version where a stats professor divides people into two groups. One group flips a coin 50 times and writes on a whiteboard the results. The other comes up with 50 results.<p>They leave the room and when they come back immediately know which is which. Specifically because of the over-alternation that yours mentioned. A string of HHHHHH is exactly as likely as HTHTHT, but people don't intuit that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 19:26:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50077238</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50077238</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50077238</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "Show HN: How random are you?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It might not be that someone is more random than an RNG, but that the distribution of numbers in your 190 vs. theirs appears more "random". It's a limited sample size.<p>If yours happened to contain  consecutive digits or common ones (ending in zero, significant numbers like 911 or 42 or 69), that would imply less randomness even if it's actually the result of "real" RNG.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 19:23:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50077194</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50077194</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50077194</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "Gemini 4 Argon"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agreed. It's a fun cultural tidbit but not really a useful benchmark for model capabilities.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:47:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50075729</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50075729</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50075729</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "Apple HomeView"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It would be great if this could also be a thermostat. For $300 you could get rid of Nest (etc) while adding all of these other use cases.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:44:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50075687</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50075687</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50075687</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "Apple HomeView"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Do very old (like 5+ years old) iPads cost more than $300? Seems like you wouldn't need constant OS updates for their use case but idk.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:39:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50075615</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50075615</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50075615</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "Apple HomeView"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Homepods have intercom support.<p>What's also crazy is that they can detect fire alarms, will alert your iPhone, and then can pipe both sound and voice to the HomePod. It announces that it's going to do so, so it's not a privacy nightmare.<p>Pretty cool. I didn't know it existed until it happened. (Thankfully nothing bad.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:37:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50075580</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50075580</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50075580</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "Apple HomeView"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's like a smart thermostat, always plugged in.<p>(Not exactly the same power feed but you know what I mean)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:34:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50075529</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50075529</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50075529</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "Typesafe AI raises $870M at $7.5B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah but there are also network effects of using fitness apps. Every engineer I know switches easily between Codex and Claude Code when one gets better than the other.<p>Jev has been around for a couple weeks. Cost and performance matter more than anything. Staying with an existing provider (the # of people choosing Jev without already having a frontier API key is probably zero?) is way easier than this.<p>What the hell are we even talking about.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 22:46:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50027534</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50027534</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50027534</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "Meta and Microsoft take steps to reduce employee usage of Claude AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Models are getting better all the time and either keeping prices or lowering them.<p>What you could achieve with $10k a year ago vs today is quite different.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 05:17:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50002017</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50002017</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50002017</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tyre in "Gleam doesn't compile to Erlang source anymore"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What was your background before Erlang? I came from Ruby, so Elixir felt much more like home than Erlang.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 22:38:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49985148</link><dc:creator>tyre</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49985148</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49985148</guid></item></channel></rss>