<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: tzebco</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=tzebco</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 06:48:01 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=tzebco" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tzebco in "JavaScript-heavy approaches are not compatible with long-term performance goals"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yep, that's the ideal approach for decent browsers. A curious caveat is that IE 8 and below will interpret that example HTML as <custom-ele></><stdelement></> (ie. as siblings, not parent and child) and therefore not apply any component-scoped styles. Not ideal.<p>Of course nobody uses those browsers anymore, the same caveat applies to non-custom HTML5 elements, and the bad behavior has long been preventable with JavaScript [0]. But anyone (else) with an extreme backwards compatibility mindset might consider if they could instead bootstrap from <div class="custom-ele"><stdelement></></> and (if needed and in window) a coordinating MutationObserver.<p>[0] <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20091031083341/http://diveintohtml5.org/semantics.html#unknown-elements" rel="nofollow">https://web.archive.org/web/20091031083341/http://diveintoht...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 13:41:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47034816</link><dc:creator>tzebco</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47034816</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47034816</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tzebco in "Plain Vanilla Web"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I feel the same way, although I do struggle with excluding people who use older technology. I suppose TLS 1.2 is fairly old at this point ...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 10:09:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43961365</link><dc:creator>tzebco</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43961365</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43961365</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by tzebco in "Plain Vanilla Web"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're not the only one. I block most subresources by default and was disappointed to see empty figures peppered throughout their articles. I'm learning to not automatically equate advocacy of "vanilla" with advocacy of robustness.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 09:45:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43961219</link><dc:creator>tzebco</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43961219</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43961219</guid></item></channel></rss>