<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: uncleocode</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=uncleocode</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 10:09:10 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=uncleocode" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by uncleocode in "GLM-5.3-Flash"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The lack of measurement causes existence of such claims or discussion. Last Friday I built this Model fingerprint calculator and I tested between OxAlpha with all other claimed models, the only match was GLM. It generates, or measures regardless of the model-weights or its training data. No need guessing when one can measure it. I tested with Gemini family too, far different. Here is the link to my experiment <a href="https://github.com/unclecode/modelprint" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/unclecode/modelprint</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 04:05:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49459563</link><dc:creator>uncleocode</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49459563</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49459563</guid></item></channel></rss>