<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: upofadown</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=upofadown</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:57:36 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=upofadown" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[Wine Now Runs on OpenBSD]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=179236125692175&w=2">https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=179236125692175&w=2</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50150820">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50150820</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 10:54:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&amp;m=179236125692175&amp;w=2</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50150820</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50150820</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by upofadown in "Why I Wrote PGP (1991, revised 1999)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One big usability issue these days is that PGP identities come in the form of a file. Lots of people don't have the concept of that anymore.<p>Dunno that things have gotten much better over the years. End to end encryption is still fairly unusable to most. I think that rather than spending so much time on the cryptography we should instead work on a E2EE usability standard. Having everyone doing their own thing with respect to usability is not working out.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 20:46:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50109974</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50109974</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50109974</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by upofadown in "Why I Wrote PGP (1991, revised 1999)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Obligatory response to "The PGP Problem":<p>*  <a href="https://articles.59.ca/doku.php?id=pgpfan:tpp" rel="nofollow">https://articles.59.ca/doku.php?id=pgpfan:tpp</a><p>By what I saw, there wasn't really anything anyone would care about in <a href="https://gpg.fail/" rel="nofollow">https://gpg.fail/</a> . The GnuPG problem actually declined to respond to some of them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 20:42:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50109922</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50109922</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50109922</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by upofadown in "Wanted to download an ISO, ended up writing a kernel exploit"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>... and don't take the vendor's word for it. I got burned on a GL-SFT1200 that way. It runs their version of OpenWRT. You can't install generic OpenWRT.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:07:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50102489</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50102489</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50102489</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by upofadown in "Forging 1024-bit RSA signatures in nearly SNFS time [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>From the article:<p>>Still, some real-world systems continue to use blind-signature, also known as textbook, RSA.<p>I think those are two different things.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 01:19:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49839061</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49839061</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49839061</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by upofadown in "Transit rewards"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Once you are in the Waymo, why bother getting out just to get on a bus?<p>In New York, increases in the use of ride services like Uber mostly came from bus and subway riders[1]. If we are being charitable to Google, we might assume that this initiative is intended to reduce the same sort of trend. If we are not being charitable, we might assume that this initiative is intended to encourage current bus riders to expose themselves to the product.<p>[1] <a href="https://www.6sqft.com/mta-says-uber-use-is-the-cause-of-nyc-subway-and-bus-ridership-drop/" rel="nofollow">https://www.6sqft.com/mta-says-uber-use-is-the-cause-of-nyc-...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 11:25:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49814394</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49814394</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49814394</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by upofadown in "RSA-896"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hard to judge. The bottleneck is the phase of the algorithm where a really big linear system needs to be solved. That takes a lot of communication between nodes. The breakthrough in using GPUs is that there is good communication between nodes[1]. At the scale of 1024 bit RSA the communication might become a bottleneck again.<p>[1] <a href="https://cognition.com/blog/factoring-rsa-260" rel="nofollow">https://cognition.com/blog/factoring-rsa-260</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 14:28:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49776254</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49776254</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49776254</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by upofadown in "RSA-896"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is someone providing prize money again? RSA ended the contest in 2007.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 10:44:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49774498</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49774498</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49774498</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by upofadown in "Keys Not Included: recovering the signing keys for US driver's license barcodes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well most people don't verify identity with some sort of physical key. So it doesn't work as an analogy in the first place for signatures...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 17:00:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49743560</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49743560</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49743560</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The XMPP Newsletter August 2026]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://xmpp.org/2026/09/the-xmpp-newsletter-august-2026/">https://xmpp.org/2026/09/the-xmpp-newsletter-august-2026/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49724469">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49724469</a></p>
<p>Points: 4</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 10:35:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://xmpp.org/2026/09/the-xmpp-newsletter-august-2026/</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49724469</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49724469</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by upofadown in "How Trail of Bits helps verify the integrity of Signal chats"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Allegedly, Signalgate was caused by Apple helpfully mapping the wrong number to a name. Then Signal mapped that number to the wrong cryptographic identity.<p>A Third Party Breached The Intercept’s Signal Tip Line and Has Been Soliciting Whistleblowers <a href="https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/intercept-signal-tip-line-breach-hack" rel="nofollow">https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/intercept-signal-tip-line-bre...</a><p>Twilio Incident: What Signal Users Need to Know <a href="https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/4850133017242-Twilio-Incident-What-Signal-Users-Need-to-Know" rel="nofollow">https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/4850133017242-T...</a><p>Russian State-Backed Hackers Intensify Attacks on Signal Messenger Accounts <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/signal-attacks-russian-fackers-target/" rel="nofollow">https://thecyberexpress.com/signal-attacks-russian-fackers-t...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 00:27:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690282</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690282</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49690282</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by upofadown in "How Trail of Bits helps verify the integrity of Signal chats"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Unfortunately, in an end to end encrypted messaging system, an identity is denoted by some sort of long number. That is an inescapable fact. Trusting a third party to correctly map, say,  a phone number to a cryptographic identity number eventually results in the sort of attacks we have been seeing with phone oriented encrypted messengers recently like WhatsApp and Signal. The PGP people were doing the right thing when they were doing education in the form of key signing parties. That is something the user needs to know.<p>Anonymous messengers have no real choice and have to use some sort of number for identity. See Briar, Session or Tox for examples.<p>My comments on Signalgate 1.0:<p><a href="https://articles.59.ca/doku.php?id=em:sg" rel="nofollow">https://articles.59.ca/doku.php?id=em:sg</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 10:28:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49682311</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49682311</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49682311</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Starlink Signal Leakage Threatens Radio Astronomy's Most Critical Frequencies]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.gadgetreview.com/starlinks-signal-leakage-is-threatening-radio-astronomys-most-critical-frequencies">https://www.gadgetreview.com/starlinks-signal-leakage-is-threatening-radio-astronomys-most-critical-frequencies</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667375">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667375</a></p>
<p>Points: 144</p>
<p># Comments: 87</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 00:40:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.gadgetreview.com/starlinks-signal-leakage-is-threatening-radio-astronomys-most-critical-frequencies</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667375</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667375</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[A Decade of Hype, 3k Roofs, and One Redirect URL: Tesla Kills the Solar Roof]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.gadgetreview.com/a-decade-of-hype-3000-roofs-and-one-redirect-url-tesla-kills-the-solar-roof">https://www.gadgetreview.com/a-decade-of-hype-3000-roofs-and-one-redirect-url-tesla-kills-the-solar-roof</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667360">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667360</a></p>
<p>Points: 18</p>
<p># Comments: 8</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 00:38:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.gadgetreview.com/a-decade-of-hype-3000-roofs-and-one-redirect-url-tesla-kills-the-solar-roof</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667360</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667360</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by upofadown in "I've factored the RSA keys of a Certificate Authority from the 90s"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What does the speed of RSA have to do with anything?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 16:08:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49612352</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49612352</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49612352</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by upofadown in "I've factored the RSA keys of a Certificate Authority from the 90s"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My article:<p>2048 Bit RSA and the Year 2030 <a href="https://articles.59.ca/doku.php?id=em:20482030" rel="nofollow">https://articles.59.ca/doku.php?id=em:20482030</a><p>We don't have any way to predict when and if 2048 bit RSA would be factorable at this time. We would need a breakthrough in hardware and/or algorithms. The common estimation that it is equivalent to the difficulty of brute forcing symmetrical 112 bit encryption seems to be based on some sort of straightforward extrapolation. It doesn't take into account the amount of memory required for the poorly reducible matrix reduction step in the currently known best algorithm. That's 10^18 bytes of memory, or a million terabytes, somehow coupled to enough processing power to actually make anything possible.<p>Even if you accept the 112 bit estimate, that works out to something like 400 thousand years using the Bitcoin network as a reference to what we could reasonably achieve.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 12:10:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49609239</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49609239</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49609239</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by upofadown in "I've factored the RSA keys of a Certificate Authority from the 90s"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This article from 2000 is about estimating what would be required to factor 1024 bit RSA:<p>A Cost-Based Security Analysis of Symmetric and Asymmetric Key Lengths <a href="https://cr.yp.to/bib/2000/silverman.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://cr.yp.to/bib/2000/silverman.pdf</a><p>It was a response to the idea that 1024 bit RSA was under threat at the time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 11:53:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49609063</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49609063</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49609063</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by upofadown in "A/I shuts down"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I note that that extensive list only contains a single death, due to a power failure. Extreme civil disobedience, but not really terrorism.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 18:01:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49589114</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49589114</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49589114</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by upofadown in "IBM Quantum Nighthawk R2"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You can attempt 15 yourself if you want:<p><a href="https://towardsdatascience.com/where-are-we-with-shors-algorithm/" rel="nofollow">https://towardsdatascience.com/where-are-we-with-shors-algor...</a><p>If you run it over and over again you will eventually get 3 or 5...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 11:16:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49585385</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49585385</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49585385</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by upofadown in "RSA-260 Factorized"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This article (mine) is about this:<p>2048 Bit RSA and the Year 2030 <a href="https://articles.59.ca/doku.php?id=em:20482030" rel="nofollow">https://articles.59.ca/doku.php?id=em:20482030</a><p>I guess it could be updated to include this latest factoring result. Said result would not change the conclusion of the article.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 10:18:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49575067</link><dc:creator>upofadown</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49575067</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49575067</guid></item></channel></rss>