<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: urutom</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=urutom</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:32:41 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=urutom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by urutom in "Amateur armed with ChatGPT solves an Erdős problem"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What I find fascinating about the shared prompt isn’t just the result, but the visible thinking process. Math papers usually skip all the messy parts and just present the polished proof. But here you get something closer to their notepad. I also find it oddly endearing when the AI says things like “Interesting!” It almost feels like a researcher encouraging themselves after a small progress. It gives me rare feeling of watching the search itself, not just the final result.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 09:53:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47908919</link><dc:creator>urutom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47908919</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47908919</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by urutom in "I miss thinking hard"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One thing this discussion made me realize is that "thinking hard" might not be a single mode of thinking.<p>In grad school, I had what I'd call the classic version. I stayed up all night mentally working on a topology question about turning a 2-torus inside out. I already knew you can't flip a torus inside out in ordinary R^3 without self-intersection. So I kept moving and stretching the torus and the surrounding space in my head, trying to understand where the obstruction actually lived.<p>Sometime around sunrise, it clicked that if you allow the move to go through infinity(so effectively S^3), the inside/outside distinction I was relying on just collapses, and the obstruction I was visualizing dissolves. Birds were chirping, I hadn't slept, and nothing useful came out of it, but my internal model of space felt permanently upgraded. That's clearly "thinking hard" in the sense.<p>But there's another mode I've experienced that feels related but different. With a tough Code Golf problem, I might carry it around for a week. I'm not actively grinding on it the whole time, but the problem stays loaded in the background. Then suddenly, in the shower or on a walk, a compression trick or a different representation just clicks.<p>That doesn't feel "hard" moment to moment. It's more like keeping a problem resident in memory long enough for the right structure to surface.<p>One is concentrated and exhausting, the other is diffuse and slow-burning. They're different phenomenologically, but both feel like forms of deep engagement that are easy to crowd out.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 06:43:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46882330</link><dc:creator>urutom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46882330</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46882330</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by urutom in "Show HN: Exploring Mathematics with Python"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I own the original Exploring Mathematics with Your Computer(Turbo Pascal version).
It’s an excellent introduction to algorithms for people coming from a mathematics background.
Really happy to see it revived in Python.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2025 04:50:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46382145</link><dc:creator>urutom</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46382145</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46382145</guid></item></channel></rss>