The Sony RAW file rendered terrible compared to Lightroom.

I found the interface unintuitive and did not even manage to locate the much praised Color grading features. That tab opens with a Video view.

This needs some work to compete with Lightroom for Photos - I see that it's Beta 1, just saying.

All I am saying is that if you Follow accounts you are interested in and like a few relevant posts, the platform likely becomes quite usable.

I believe it strongly depends on what you interact with.

At some point I also had a lot of US news in my feed, but once I stopped opening those posts and instead used the 'Not interested in this post' button or muted the author, they disappeared.

Probably following other accounts or liking photography posts also helped.

I'm not paying $40 for a taskbar replacement. And not for two years of updates and a two device limit on top.

Maybe if it was $10, I could consider it. Prices for macOS apps are insane in my opinion. Everyone wants to charge yearly or every two years now too.

The EU's DMA has been a step in the right direction, even if it's yet been fairly toothless with Apple and Google flouting it.

Despite agentic tools being used by millions of developers now, I am not aware of a single real case where accidental reproduction of copyrightable code has been an issue.

Further, some model providers offer indemnity clauses.

It seems like a non-issue to me, practically.

Does it work well for resolving merge conflicts in your experience?

  git worktree add -b feature-2 ../feature-2

Not sure why you felt the need to switch the topic to Grok. About its nudification incident, it seems a bit far stretched to say that malicious actors bypassing its safety controls was not an accident.

Initially, the image features were restricted to paying subscribers to prevent abuse by anonymous actors; this obviously happened while they were tightening safety controls to stop abuse.

If you're going to bring up that old topic, at least try to get the facts straight.

If the system does crash, nothing of value would be lost. And we would be rid of ransomware.

With this particular incident with apparent US strikes on a school adjacent to a military complex, and formerly part of that military complex, you would think it must be obvious to any reasonable person that we did not knowingly target a school.

Yet here we are.

It's inappropriate to label a free side project 'junk' or 'slop' even if it contains major errors.

Particularly when there's a disclaimer about possible inaccuracies on the page.

Personally, I don't think I will be putting any such disclaimers or disclosures on my work, unless I deem it relevant to the functionality.

And Google thinks it can pull this ridiculous stunt.

Personally I experienced this when a specialized doctor believed a drug interaction to be the opposite, thinking A hinders the absorption of B, when actually it hinders the clearance, tripling concentration of B.

Without AI, I would have been clueless about this and could not have spotted the mistake. I don't know if it would truly have been critical, but it did shake my confidence in doctors.