<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: vasusai</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=vasusai</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 01:26:03 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=vasusai" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vasusai in "U.S. may have overthrown Venezuela due to chat with Grok"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not exactly government-by-LLM but feels like we're moving that way.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 10:07:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49942866</link><dc:creator>vasusai</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49942866</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49942866</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vasusai in "Understanding Frontier Artificial Intelligence"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think if an AI developed completely new fields of thought or science.<p>But given our current relationship even if it did I can't foresee a point where it couldn't walk us through the necessary steps or supply the pros/cons for whatever problem is being addressed.<p>2 issues - trying to understand how it came to its conclusion because I feel true AI has got to be non-human intelligence. Or a something catastrophic happens and we as a species are back in the stone age. Imagine today's AI trying to converse with a cave man (yes, one without modern languages even).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 09:15:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49942603</link><dc:creator>vasusai</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49942603</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49942603</guid></item></channel></rss>