<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: vertere</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=vertere</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 20:13:33 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=vertere" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Dispelling misconceptions about RLHF"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm confused about their definition of RL.<p>> ... SFT is a subset of RL.<p>> The first thing to note about traditional SFT is that the responses in the examples are typically human written. ... But it is also possible to build the dataset using responses from the model we’re about to train. ... This is called Rejection Sampling.<p>I can see why someone might say there's overlap between RL and SFT (or semi-supervised FT), but how is "traditional" SFT considered RL? What is not RL then? Are they saying all supervised learning is a subset of RL, or only if it's fine tuning?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2025 12:19:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44931096</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44931096</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44931096</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Is A.I. The Death of I.P.?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You seem to have a very narrow view of what is a relevant or a valid comment. Just because a counterargument doesn't completely refute the original comment, or "introduces" new concepts, doesn't make it irrelevant or "misdirection".<p>Someone compared treatment of X 20 years ago to treatment of Y today -- seems pretty natural to bring up treatment of X more recently. You can't just say "the original comment didn't mention it so you can't mention it either".<p>I don't see how your accusations of bad faith are warranted.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:40:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39035848</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39035848</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39035848</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Prolog for data science"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Indentation of comments also means something. GP was not responding to the neuroscience comment.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 00:24:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35856857</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35856857</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35856857</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Samsung Profits Plunge 95%"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's still pretty meaningless unless you have some idea what the previous profit was (which the average headline reader probably doesn't). 95% of last quarter's profit could be a trivial amount or a huge amount. If last quarter's profit was $100 and this quarter's was $5, describing it as a "plunge" is misleading as it hasn't really changed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:34:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35726498</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35726498</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35726498</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "American IQ scores have rapidly dropped, proving the 'Reverse Flynn effect'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe they don't believe there are no elephants in Germany.<p>If someone came up to you on the street and said "You are an elephant. Are you an elephant?" you wouldn't say "yes".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 23:59:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35518951</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35518951</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35518951</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Australia gov wants telco Optus to pay for new passports for data breach victims"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree that treating production vs non-production as a dichotomy can be problematic, but that doesn't mean some systems aren't more sensitive than others.<p>Also security is not one dimensional. A system's required level of confidentiality might be very different from its required level of availability. Being explicit about this might be better than trying to lump different requirements into a "production" label.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 12:38:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33019722</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33019722</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33019722</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Trypophobia"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> is best avoided, phobia or no.<p>Strongly agree. I briefly developed a morbid fascination a few years ago, which then developed into a rather unpleasant sort of phobia/aversion.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 02:57:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32393808</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32393808</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32393808</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "What's New in Python 3.11?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> It's really not a lot to grok, at least by most other language's standards.<p>Yes, but people have been attracted to Python largely because it's not like a lot of other languages. It is/was concise, simple, dynamic and fairly easy to learn. I think some of the new features, even if they don't make it a <i>worse</i> language, make it less "Pythonic", and so tend to undermine its comparative advantage. For experienced programmers the new features might not seem complicated, but python is used by a lot of people who are not in that category, including people for whom software development isn't their primary job.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:51:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31894589</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31894589</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31894589</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Inflation is differential and restructuring (2021)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Indeed. Any suggestion that economists (neo-classical or otherwise) don't care enough about relative price changes is utterly ridiculous. They just don't call them <i>inflation</i>.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2022 10:35:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31527976</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31527976</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31527976</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Data Science in Context – Peter Norvig's New Book"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I can't see where they criticize the term "black box". So, ironically, this is just a complaint that they used some terminology you don't approve of.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2022 12:25:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31503526</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31503526</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31503526</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Ask HN: Why doesn't math look like a programming language?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Standard notation like sigma for sum isn't really a descriptiveness issue, everyone knows what that means. Not dissimilar to programming languages using `+` instead of `plus()`. Non-standard variables are where more descriptive names would be useful, though the tendency to use single letter (greek or otherwise) names is reinforced partly by writing `ab` for `a*b`.<p>Also much of math notation is effectively 2d. Programming langs use linear text. Latex syntax is sometimes used for a linear-text representation (even if it's not intended to be rendered), but it reduces readability.<p>And people <i>still</i> write equations by hand a lot, because the notation is more efficient than typing it out.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 11:14:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31445812</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31445812</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31445812</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Ask HN: Why hasn't Git been adopted outside of software engineering?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It seems like broader adoption of Markdown (or similar lightweight markup) would greatly help with broader adoption of git.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 11:19:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31408783</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31408783</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31408783</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Ask HN: Why hasn't Git been adopted outside of software engineering?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Many software projects have their documentation in Git. That is partly to have the documentation sitting alongside the code, but I would argue it's also because Git is good for managing documentation. Other fields have similar types of documentation and content that Git could be be similarly useful for (whether it's worth learning Git just for those purposes is another question).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 11:14:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31408748</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31408748</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31408748</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Ask HN: Why hasn't Git been adopted outside of software engineering?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nobody has mentioned pull requests, content review, managing commit/write privileges. There's a bunch of basic workflow things there that version control systems can facilitate. That doesn't mean you specifically need Git (or even a general VCS) for those things, but there are places where it could beat the status quo significantly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 10:56:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31408609</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31408609</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31408609</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Ask HN: Why hasn't Git been adopted outside of software engineering?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For drafting yes, but at some point someone will probably want to edit or review the parts collectively. It's easy to prematurely consolidate the chapters into one file, and then any further changes have to be merged into the 'master'. A proper VCS can help here.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 10:39:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31408480</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31408480</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31408480</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Ask HN: Why hasn't Git been adopted outside of software engineering?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good point, but then the question is why haven't more suitable diff tools been developed?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 10:22:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31408355</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31408355</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31408355</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Web Scraping with Python"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I assumed most people were talking about dealing with single sites. From your previous comment about API documentation and "hand evaluating" Javascript I gathered that you were too. How would those things help one solve the general case?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 02:14:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31393138</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31393138</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31393138</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Web Scraping with Python"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The title is problematic but I don't see how that justifies someone calling the whole article low quality or spam.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 01:41:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31392971</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31392971</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31392971</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "How to Open a Door (1979) [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_td1X_c5Gg" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_td1X_c5Gg</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2021 23:47:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29708386</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29708386</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29708386</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vertere in "Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder (1996) [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Related episode of Build For Tomorrow (formerly Pessimists Archive) podcast:<p><a href="https://player.fm/series/build-for-tomorrow/you-are-not-addicted-to-technology" rel="nofollow">https://player.fm/series/build-for-tomorrow/you-are-not-addi...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 07:47:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29482224</link><dc:creator>vertere</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29482224</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29482224</guid></item></channel></rss>