<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: vladimirralev</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=vladimirralev</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 16:50:09 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=vladimirralev" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "Eight Myths on Software Engineering and GenAI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>100% agree. Plus you can easily instruct it to use inspiration from unspecified unrelated and counterintuitive concepts at random and in parallel. The "jump" is not "on" by default because it would waste tokens on high risk paths, not because it's incapable. It's very capable if you are willing to wast some tokens.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 12:33:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49181959</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49181959</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49181959</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "Wages in America Are Too Low for the 30% Rule to Work for Renters Anymore"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, might as well just give those $2500 to the landlords directly and skip the middle-man. It reads like a joke.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 14:26:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48585916</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48585916</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48585916</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "I don't care how well your "AI" works"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Today's high-end LLMs can do a lot of unsupervised work. Debug iterations are at least junior level. Audio and visual output verification is still very week (i.e. to verify web page layout and component reactivity). Once the visual model is good enough to look at the screen pixels and understand, it will instantly replace junior devs. Currently if you have only text output all new LLMs can iterate flawlessly and solve problems on it. New backend dev from scratch is completely doable with vibe coding now, with some exceptions around race conditions and legacy code comprehension.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 14:25:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46057659</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46057659</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46057659</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "Gold hits all time high"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes you are making my point exactly, I just gave you a link to the official federal reserve website that values gold at $42 and you still refer to it as a conspiracy theory. Surely they could have fixed this by now if it was a typo or a conspiracy.<p>The fact they they kept the price fixed should serve as a reminder they can do this at any time. There is no conspiracy theory, they've literally done this and nobody challenged them and no laws have changed since then (thus the "ancient law" that is somehow still in effect). The sophisticated economists that study "real world economic policy works by virtue of steady hands and rigorously applied norms" can make another "ancient law" any time they want.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 21:34:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45419042</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45419042</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45419042</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "Gold hits all time high"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well, please show me any mainstream finance media that questions it. The Fed has a monthly press conference, I don't think they were asked even once in the last 10 years at least... Most of the buying now is from Asia supposedly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 20:46:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45418564</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45418564</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45418564</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "Gold hits all time high"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's a little bit broader than this. In the Fed there is the so called "statutory price for gold" and it's not limited to gold certificates. Any gold in the Fed would be priced at $42 by law. The fact that they don't technically own any gold and work around the issue only makes it so much more amusing. It only serves to tell people they can fix prices and make outrageous course-correction changes overnight and people will still argue "it's fine and it's legal" afterwards.<p><a href="https://www.federalreserve.gov/data/intlsumm/current.htm" rel="nofollow">https://www.federalreserve.gov/data/intlsumm/current.htm</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 20:42:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45418527</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45418527</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45418527</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "Gold hits all time high"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good time to remind everybody that the Fed, the US central bank, prices gold at $42.22 for some reason and nobody questions it ever. And all those dignified educated respectable board members and econ PhDs give speeches about science-based market economy, maintaining credibility and staying away from politics while caring about the wellbeing of households and families.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 20:10:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45418174</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45418174</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45418174</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "Grocery prices have jumped up, and there's no relief in sight"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am fascinated your comment is buried down here with absolutely no discussion. Money printing is undoubtedly the biggest factor in this particular inflation spike, but something is quietly steering the narrative away from it almost everywhere.<p>While the question of alternative actions and outcomes is also valid, this is a literal 10-trillion dollar question that nobody in a leadership position wants to ask or answer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 13:38:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45301551</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45301551</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45301551</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "US economy added just 22,000 jobs in August, unemployment highest in 4 yrs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If AI is the cause, it will only stimulate investment in more AI and accelerate the layoffs though. And because they don't have other tools, looks like this is exactly what they are going to do. Investment tends to concentrate massively at the festest-growing trend which this time is just replacing workers with AI.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 15:38:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45139822</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45139822</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45139822</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "A Random Walk in 10 Dimensions (2021)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They say "these results are completely general for any probability distribution with zero mean and a finite covariance matrix with rank much larger than the number of steps". It's not clear to me if that condition implies the number of steps is much lower than the dimensions of the random walk space or perhaps the probability distribution needs to be concentrated into a smaller number of dimensions to begin with? In which case the results is much less shocking.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 21:01:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45120386</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45120386</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45120386</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "Yamanot.es: A music box of train station melodies from the JR Yamanote Line"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>LOL this is unexpectedly well done.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 12:17:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45051240</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45051240</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45051240</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "Can Large Language Models Play Text Games Well?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've seen both replit and cline agents iteratively debug hard problem with massive amount of log lines. They can do it already.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 20:18:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44467558</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44467558</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44467558</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "There are no new ideas in AI, only new datasets"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It is still doing a great job for a few frames, you could keep it more anchored to the state of the game if you prompt it. Much like you can prompt coding agents to keep a log of all decisions previously made. Permanenece is excellent, it slips often but it mostly because it is not grounded to specific game state by the prompt or by the decision log.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 21:41:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44428212</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44428212</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44428212</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "There are no new ideas in AI only new datasets"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's not ideal, but you can prompt it with an image of a game frame, explain the objects and physics in text and let it generate a few frames of gameplay as a substitute for controller input as well as what it expects as an outcome. I am not talking about real interactive gameplay.<p>I am just saying we have proof that it can understand complex worlds and sets of rules, and then abide by them. It doesn't know how to use a controller and it doesn't know how to explore the game physics on its own, but those steps are much easier to implement based on how coding agents are able to iterate and explore solutions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 21:32:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44428113</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44428113</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44428113</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "There are no new ideas in AI, only new datasets"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>He is not using appropriate models for this conclusion and neither is he using state of the art models in this research and moreover he doesn't have an expensive foundational model to build upon for 2d games. It's just a fun project.<p>A serious attempt at video/vision would involve some probabilistic latent space that can be noised in ways that make sense for games in general. I think veo3 proves that ai can generalize 2d and even 3d games, generating a video under prompt constraints is basically playing a game. I think you could prompt veo3 to play any game for a few seconds and it will generally make sense even though it is not fine tuned.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 18:56:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44426640</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44426640</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44426640</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "Airlines are charging solo passengers higher fares than groups"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A company can figure out the premium and just average it out across the pax who book thru them. Further they could risk-manage no-shows or other bad behaviour based on ratings and feedback. It's just wasting everybody's time to go thru intermediaries.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 21:25:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44130551</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44130551</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44130551</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "Claude 4"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's placed at 10. Below claude-3.5-sonnet, GPT 4.1 and o3-mini.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44065964</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44065964</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44065964</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "“Most promising signs yet” of alien life on a planet beyond our Solar System"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Dark forest theory is about very advanced civilisations not engaging with anything around them. Limited resources are not an issue in this case. You can easily just do everything in parallel with AI or other automated control system, using stars as energy sources, including spawning whole decoy civilisations at different stages of development. Because we see so many stars we know nobody is running out of energy yet.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 12:49:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43716047</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43716047</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43716047</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "“Most promising signs yet” of alien life on a planet beyond our Solar System"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Dark forest theory is wrong. Staying undetectable is always inferior to both staying undetectable and safely deploying varyingly detectable decoy targets at safe distance to probe the situation and gather intelligence.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 09:58:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43714785</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43714785</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43714785</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by vladimirralev in "Markov Chain Monte Carlo Without All the Bullshit (2015)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But also "the memory" of the random walk can be encoded in a state itself. In your example you can just keep accumulating the visited nodes, so your state space will be now the space of tuples of nodes from your initial space.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:37:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43703675</link><dc:creator>vladimirralev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43703675</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43703675</guid></item></channel></rss>