<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: volleygman180</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=volleygman180</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 06:07:40 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=volleygman180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "Anthropic Faces Potentially "Business-Ending" Copyright Lawsuit"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How many members of the class have abstained from using the LLMs provided by the major AI companies, raise your hands...<p>That's what I thought. Members of the class should be disqualified from joining based on this criteria alone</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 14:17:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44723689</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44723689</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44723689</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "Claude Code weekly rate limits"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agreed. The internet would be livid if Apple Music or Hulu limited how many hours you were allowed to stream per week. Especially the users who pay for the top-tier packages that include 4K (or lossless for music), extra channel add-ons, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 22:28:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44716510</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44716510</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44716510</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "Fine dining restaurants researching guests to make their dinner unforgettable"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I haven't seen The Menu, but try watching The Bear instead. They demonstrate this level-of-service & mentality and it's much more sincere than you think.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2025 22:02:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44554168</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44554168</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44554168</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "WeatherStar 4000+: Weather Channel Simulator"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was impressed as soon as it loaded and immediately said, "Yea but what about the music?". Then I noticed the sound toggle button.<p>Absolute perfection!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 17:53:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44128454</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44128454</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44128454</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "A study reveals that deciduous trees' roots remain active in winter"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When controlling invasive plants like honeysuckle using glyphosate, one of the more responsible approaches is to wait until all of the trees have lost their leaves in the fall and entered dormancy. The idea being that because the honeysuckle still has its leaves, you can safely use glyphosate on it with minimal to no impact on the rest of the ecosystem. I've always had my doubts (particularly due to studies on mycelium being exposed to glyphosate), but this is one of best practices that conservation departments recommend.<p>With this new study, it opens the possibility that trees may still have root absorption during the winter season. I feel like it is further evidence of how glyphosate likely always impacts the ecosystem and has no truly safe usage</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 19:36:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43474984</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43474984</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43474984</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "Anthropic: "Applicants should not use AI assistants""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It'd be more analogous if it were a brewery telling interviewees not to drink during the interview</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42918116</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42918116</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42918116</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "Nintendo announces the Switch 2 [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So can we finally expect to see first-party Switch 1 games get discounts?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 14:45:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42725864</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42725864</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42725864</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "Famous AI Artist Says He's Losing Millions from People Stealing His Work"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's fun to ponder how modern society will evolve if this same mindset is applied to other domains that generative AI is eventually used for, specifically sciences. If AI (art) works cannot be copyrighted, there's hope that the same would apply to the other domains and prohibiting AI-generated works from being patented. Imagine AI finding 50 new ways of making insulin that don't violate the existing patents...<p>One can dream, right?! This could cripple monopolies and bring more power back to small businesses and individuals, as the capitalistic playing-field is leveled.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2024 16:25:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41722264</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41722264</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41722264</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "Legalizing sports gambling was a mistake"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> So what can be done now? I don't think OSB is going to be redeclared illegal. I don't think that would be a good idea either.<p>I disagree - I think it would be a great idea. While some may argue that gambling is a zero-sum game (which isn't exactly great, in and of itself), it's really a net loss. While some people may win a bit of money, I'd argue that the degree to which their lives are improved is much less than the degree that some others' lives are destroyed. Gambling, ultimately, being a negative sum.<p>> Millions of people have started sports betting. If it becomes illegal, it won't make them stop<p>I disagree with this too. It's substantially easier for any random person to simply tap a few buttons on their phone to place a bet than to find and arrange opportunities with others to bet on sports or visit a brick & mortar betting site. The level of effort of placing a phone bet is so small (and with 24/7 access), you'd have a very hard time arguing that making OSB illegal would only marginally impact the amount of sports gambling taking place.<p>Bottom line: gambling is an addictive activity for all people and some more so than others. Limiting access to it will have a positive impact on pretty much everyone who does't own or work at a gambling company.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 19:29:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41674619</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41674619</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41674619</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "OpenAI to Become For-Profit Company"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Earth</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 18:07:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41661361</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41661361</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41661361</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "Stop trying to avoid distractions, just get better ones instead"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I couldn't disagree more, at least in the examples that the author gives.<p>Everything in moderation. Screens (and for children), particularly.<p>The author's perspective comes off as someone who's trying to justify their questionable choices to themself.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 12:33:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41510741</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41510741</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41510741</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[iPhone 16 just made the iPhone 16 Pro look pointless]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/iphones/iphone-16-just-made-the-iphone-16-pro-look-pointless-heres-why">https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/iphones/iphone-16-just-made-the-iphone-16-pro-look-pointless-heres-why</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41499313">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41499313</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:30:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/iphones/iphone-16-just-made-the-iphone-16-pro-look-pointless-heres-why</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41499313</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41499313</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "I've built my first successful side project, and I hate it"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, yes, and yes. I feel this</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 13:18:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41319935</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41319935</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41319935</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "AltStore PAL receives Epic Games MegaGrant, will no longer require subscription"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sounds like it's a game of CTF and we know who's winning :(</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 22:09:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41251031</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41251031</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41251031</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "Google and Meta struck secret ads deal to target teenagers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Are commercials during saturday morning cartoons <i>not</i> ads targeted at children?<p>When I was growing up at least, it was all for candy, toys, and sugary cereal, and often had kids or cartoon characters featured in the commercial.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 13:34:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41191319</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41191319</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41191319</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "After 10 years, Yelp gave my app 4 days"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And I'd put Apple App Store Review team (specifically, the appeals/rejection team) at the top of this list</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 14:51:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41129700</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41129700</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41129700</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "Apple unveils 'Passwords' manager app at WWDC 2024"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> you need to accept a model where there's ongoing pay for that work<p>Before they switched to subscriptions, it <i>still</i> worked like that: 1Password 4, 1Password 5, 1Password 6 - I paid money each time a new version came out. Sometimes I paid the same day of the release and upgraded immediately. Other times, I may have waited a little bit longer and continued with the version that I had.<p>Nobody's asking for a free lunch.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 15:05:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40647052</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40647052</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40647052</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "Kino: Pro Video Camera"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I mean that initially the 15% commission was only for subscription sales. Then more recently, Apple added the small business program which gave 15% commission for <i>any</i> sales (not only subscriptions), at least for smaller companies</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 13:24:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40523424</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40523424</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40523424</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "Kino: Pro Video Camera"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Subscription fatigue is very real today, but to your point, as a business you can't provide eternal updates (work) for free.<p>In the old days, you'd buy a new version of Mac or Windows or any software that you run on it (Office, Parallels, etc.) when you wanted the new features each year.<p>I think Apple's App Store has a lot to do with why everything is now subscription-based. They used to offer developers a smaller Apple-commission (15%) for subscription sales instead of the typical 30% for in-app purchase sales and paid-apps.<p>This was great for businesses, but in my opinion, only service businesses should be subscriptions - this transition would help reduce subscription fatigue. Normal software should mostly go back to just issuing new versions each year (or whatever frequency), so that consumers re-frame the purchase cycle to something that feels more reasonable again.<p>In order for this to occur, however, Apple may need to adjust the App Store algorithms. If you were to launch a new app (ex. "Kino v6"), you'd start all over again from day 1 with 0 app ratings and reviews, and not rank well on any keywords nor in the top apps charts.<p>Some apps simply rename their app with each new version, but that introduces similar complexities, especially for users who already paid & downloaded the previous "version". So in a big way, the App Store de-incentivizes any kind of transition away from a subscription-based business model.<p>The "new versions" business model vs. subscription may be similar cost to consumer (it wouldn't support monthly users), but it would allow consumers to only update when their <i>ready</i> and could continue using an old app version (especially on older devices) as long as they'd like. If a customer really likes the software, they'd likely buy the new version to access new features & device support before too long anyhow</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 19:39:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40516031</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40516031</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40516031</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by volleygman180 in "OpenAI didn’t copy Scarlett Johansson’s voice for ChatGPT, records show"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I thought it sounded like SJ when I watched the demo live <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40345775&p=6#40346221">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40345775&p=6#40346221</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2024 12:51:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40454073</link><dc:creator>volleygman180</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40454073</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40454073</guid></item></channel></rss>