Ah yes, because businesses just love to turn down free money.

>Once again, nobody is asking that. So you are misunderstanding SKG.

If SKG really does not want games to remain playable after EOL, they're certainly piss-poor communicators. I thought the whole point was to "stop killing games", i.e. make them last longer.

>No, that's not how it works. Not even close.

As far as I can tell, legislation which enables you to play a game in perpetuity instead of for a limited time will likely reduce the amount of tax revenue your gaming-related activities generate.

A useful metric to focus on here is the cost per hour of entertainment. The price of the game itself might stay the same, but the cost of your gaming itself would be subsidized.

Where exactly are you getting this from? Why are you attributing this to me, or anyone? There's not a single commenter here arguing this point of view, only some windmill-tilters arguing against it.

It's extremely difficult to see how the statement quoted below is not fairly characterized as malicious

>The industry should only be allowed to comment after the laws have been written and fulfill the goals of European citizens.

If the opposition simply seeks to silence you, rather than to argue against you, how are they not malicious?

Someone arguing the opposite position would be a corporate shill pushing for regulatory capture. Everyone who disagrees with you is always a corporate shill.

The government should give everyone free gasoline, everyone who says otherwise is a corporate shill only working to protect their profits!

They did admit to being German.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48457381

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

"Engagement" has a specific meaning. It's different from "like farming" or "karma farming". Some platforms specifically reward engagement, making it a reasonable thing to farm on those platforms.

> using automated systems for mass liking or following

Clearly the author was clueless, this has nothing whatsoever to do with engagement farming.

It's really hard to believe that you'd be writing this in good faith.

In reality, even without being publicly listed(!), these companies have already managed to become an absolutely massive part of the market. After the IPO? Hah.

No, you fucking idiot. Not everybody who disagrees with you is AI.

"Engagement farming" is a term of art with a specific meaning, basically just the adult way of saying "ragebait". People engagement farming on IG or TikTok are typically doing so by posting deliberately controversial content designed to troll upset viewers into writing upset comments. It is inherent to the technique that it only works on platforms without downvotes.

You don't see anyone "engagement farming" on Reddit either, it's always specifically "karma farming" because farming karma requires positive engagement. Engagement farmers do not care if the engagement is positive or not, the required approaches are completely different.

LLMs have solved this problem, they’ll happily deal with the software archaeology on your behalf. This is the kind of task they really excel at.

Are you joking? Guy has been tweeting in English for almost two decades, that’s not the problem.

Here's the frequency of the " - " pattern in tweets by "josefprusa"

  2020:  8 / 761 tweets  = 1.1%
  2021:  5 / 533 tweets  = 0.9%
  2022:  9 / 597 tweets  = 1.5%
  2023: 21 / 450 tweets  = 4.7%
  2024: 57 / 725 tweets  = 7.9%
  2025: 23 / 390 tweets  = 5.9%
  2026: 15 / 136 tweets  = 11.0%

Local kernel vulns are totally unimportant in any vaguely reasonable environment.

Here's the frequency of the " - " pattern in tweets by "josefprusa"

  2020:  8 / 761 tweets  = 1.1%
  2021:  5 / 533 tweets  = 0.9%
  2022:  9 / 597 tweets  = 1.5%
  2023: 21 / 450 tweets  = 4.7%
  2024: 57 / 725 tweets  = 7.9%
  2025: 23 / 390 tweets  = 5.9%
  2026: 15 / 136 tweets  = 11.0%