I’d gladly pay money for it, but that’s not actually possible. The main cost of not pirating would be time, which is unacceptable because I’m neither a teenager nor poor.

Similarly, as a rich person who travels a lot, official sports streams just aren’t available for me.

Just for fun, I tried to Google and find an official site to watch LaLiga games:

“DAZN ISN'T AVAILABLE IN THIS COUNTRY”

“The request is blocked.” -https://www.laliga.com/en-GB/where-to-watch-laliga-easports

Movistar plus is in Spanish, probably not for me

But yeah, even fucking googling “laliga official stream” brings zero working paid alternatives for very very rich me.

The misquote here does not feel accidental.

I said:

> We’re not allowed to criticise Israel because most jews are lunatics that consider such criticism an antisemitic attack on their person

If “Most Jews consider criticism of Israel to be an attack on their person” is true, then it certainly follows that “Most Jews are lunatics”.

> You could even make the case that most religious people had no choice in their adoption of that religion, but most people have the theoretical option of letting go of their religion if they so desire, but you can not stop being a Jew

Yes, I am aware that some people choose to believe this. However, outside of a specific religious community people will generally not consider you to be a Jew unless you identify as such.

I personally am not religious and therefore don’t subscribe to the belief that people can’t stop being Jews.

Why would criticising people for their religious-adjacent views be worse than criticising people for their political views?

I’m sure you’d find your own comment reprehensible if you replaced “MAGA” with “Jewish”. But why? Both are just groups of people who choose to believe in certain things.

This genocide of course involves deleting those villages.

GP invented the claim that the timing of the missing footage happened to coincide with Epstein’s death.

That’s not an unimportant detail! If their claim was true, that’d in fact be credible evidence that Epstein was murdered.

I don’t think the sources matter, you won’t find a single vaguely credible one that supports the crucial claim here.

That seems totally unsurprising to anyone who has ever worked with real CCTV setups, they’re flaming heaps of garbage from garbage suppliers set up by garbage contractors.

Why are you lying about this? How does it benefit you?

It takes less than a minute to find this claim disproven in detail https://www.wired.com/story/the-fbis-jeffrey-epstein-prison-...

The idea that the cut happened when Epstein was supposedly killing himself is something you invented yourself, not something even remotely supported by evidence.

Well, at least here in Europe I’d have to spend a decent amount of time deciding which language to use.

Which is why the fairly big Jewish population in Tehran is targeted by armed robbers on a daily basis?

Boring claim, obviously true.

> and result in a situation worse than not having secure boot to begin with

A very big claim that requires evidence.

It’s certainly rude to ring the bell in a aggressive manner, but many bells are capable of producing much softer, more polite sounds.

In super busy old European capitals I find that people increasingly just ride around with speakers playing a constant tune at a reasonable volume, a massive improvement on dense streets full of varyingly sober people.

This is not true, Tamir interceptors have been upgraded to target ballistic missiles. It is extremely visible when this happens, as the interceptors fly a very different path than usually.