<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: warpzero</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=warpzero</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 22:34:19 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=warpzero" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by warpzero in "H.264 is Magic"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was a bit disappointed in this article for the same reason: this is a great primer for people new to MPEG video compression, but it doesn't have anything to do with H.264.<p>I was hoping the author would write about H.264 specifically, for instance, how it was basically the "dumping ground" of all the little tweaks and improvements that were pulled out of MPEG-4 for one reason or another (usually because they were too computationally expensive), and why, as a result, it has thousands of different combinations of features that are extremely complicated to support, which is why it had to be grouped into "profiles" (e.g., Baseline, Main, High): <a href="http://blog.mediacoderhq.com/h264-profiles-and-levels/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.mediacoderhq.com/h264-profiles-and-levels/</a><p>I was also hoping that he would at least touch on the features that make H.264 unique from previous MPEG standards, like in-loop deblocking, CABAC Entropy Coding, etc..<p>Again, it's fine as an introduction to video encoding, but there's nothing in here specific to H.264.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 18:04:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12874569</link><dc:creator>warpzero</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12874569</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12874569</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by warpzero in "What Happens to a Startup When a Cofounder Dies"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>... but Diet Coke doesn't have sugar in it, so it shouldn't cause cavities, right? Did a joke just go over my head or am I missing something?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 14:25:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9784545</link><dc:creator>warpzero</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9784545</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9784545</guid></item></channel></rss>