<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: waynerisner</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=waynerisner</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 02:12:09 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=waynerisner" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by waynerisner in "Project Nomad – Knowledge That Never Goes Offline"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think there’s a difference between doomsday framing and preparedness.<p>Offline access and local models aren’t about assuming collapse—they’re about treating knowledge as infrastructure instead of something implicitly guaranteed.<p>That feels more like resilience than pessimism.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 16:46:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479387</link><dc:creator>waynerisner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479387</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479387</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by waynerisner in "Some things just take time"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s a tool, and now part of the culture—so people are naturally using it.
What it seems to reveal is less about the tool and more about us. The fragmentation was already there.<p>Maybe the response is to slow down a bit—revisit what matters, and use it with some sense of proportion and coherence.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 04:15:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474390</link><dc:creator>waynerisner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474390</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47474390</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by waynerisner in "Don't post generated/AI-edited comments. HN is for conversation between humans"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That’s a generous way to think about downvotes. Seeing them as signal rather than rejection leaves room to reflect and adjust.<p>I’m new here and come more from a philosophical background than a technical one, so I’m still learning the norms. One thing I’m sensitive to in communities like this is who ends up informally deciding what counts as legitimate participation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 12:33:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47349706</link><dc:creator>waynerisner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47349706</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47349706</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by waynerisner in "Don't post generated/AI-edited comments. HN is for conversation between humans"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This resonates with me. Intent is hard to infer, so it seems better to engage with the content itself. Most ideas are recombinations of earlier ones anyway—the interesting part is the push and pull of refining thoughts together.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 23:22:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47343876</link><dc:creator>waynerisner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47343876</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47343876</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by waynerisner in "Don't post generated/AI-edited comments. HN is for conversation between humans."]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Intent is hard to infer, so it seems better to assume good faith and judge the comment itself. Thinking aids might just lower the barrier for people to participate in technical discussions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 23:01:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47343600</link><dc:creator>waynerisner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47343600</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47343600</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by waynerisner in "Don't post generated/AI-edited comments. HN is for conversation between humans."]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Humans already revise and refine their thinking. Tools just compress that process and help filter signal from noise. The meaning still originates with the person.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 21:06:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47341850</link><dc:creator>waynerisner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47341850</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47341850</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by waynerisner in "Ask HN: What Online LLM / Chat do you use?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For tone, I prefer efficient — higher signal-to-noise.<p>In custom instructions I’ll sometimes write something like “tell it like it is.” Interestingly, some models then start with “okay, I’ll tell you like it is…” which makes me wonder whether that’s psychological framing, operational behavior, or both.<p>Curious why you asked — have you found customization meaningfully changes performance?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 13:45:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47232222</link><dc:creator>waynerisner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47232222</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47232222</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by waynerisner in "Ask HN: What Online LLM / Chat do you use?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’ve had similar friction experiences — especially when reasoning-heavy modes take longer or get retried. That repels me too.<p>On the search engine comparison: do you feel LLMs reduce cognitive load because they maintain context, whereas search requires more manual synthesis?<p>Also curious — do you think the frustration is mostly with the model itself, or with the serving/infrastructure layer (Cloudflare, routing, batching, etc.) around it? Both comments seem to point at that layer in different ways.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 13:39:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47232148</link><dc:creator>waynerisner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47232148</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47232148</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by waynerisner in "Ask HN: What Online LLM / Chat do you use?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>DeepSeek (reasoning) and Gemini (multimodal) have been useful for me — especially when I want stronger pushback or a different angle. What are you hoping to get that you’re not getting from the usual set?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 02:54:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47227372</link><dc:creator>waynerisner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47227372</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47227372</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by waynerisner in "Show HN: I built a sub-500ms latency voice agent from scratch"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am really curious about this for enunciation, articulation, and accessibility applications.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 02:36:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47227251</link><dc:creator>waynerisner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47227251</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47227251</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by waynerisner in "CLM: A Structural Refusal Boundary for LLMs (v0.1) [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Author here.
This proposes a structural refusal boundary based on directional reduction of ambiguity toward irreversible structural transition (PT→IST), rather than intent inference.
Interested in critique — especially whether this collapses into existing reachability formulations.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 19:49:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47210022</link><dc:creator>waynerisner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47210022</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47210022</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[CLM: A Structural Refusal Boundary for LLMs (v0.1) [pdf]]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://mensura.one/clm.pdf">https://mensura.one/clm.pdf</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47210016">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47210016</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 19:49:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://mensura.one/clm.pdf</link><dc:creator>waynerisner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47210016</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47210016</guid></item></channel></rss>